Tuesday, 8 September 2026

Gita Saar - A Muslim Perspective Part 1-O: Chapter - XIV - The Unitive Way of Transcending the Three Nature-Modalities (Gunatrayavibhaga Yoga)

Chapter - XIV

THE UNITIVE WAY OF TRANSCENDING THE THREE NATURE-MODALITIES

(Gunatrayavibhaga Yoga)

The three gunas or nature-modalities with which this Chapter is concerned belong to human nature as expressed clearly in the previous Chapter. It has also been clearly stated in XIII.26 that whatever moving and non-moving things are there in the universe, they have been created because of union with field (body comprising of nature and its modalities) and the knower of the field (the manifest form of God through the 14 Devatas together). It has been further clarified in the last Chapter (XIII. 21) that attachment to the modalities of nature was the cause of birth in “good or bad wombs”. Moreover, verses 5-6 have described the great elements, ego-sense, reason, also the Unmanifest, the ten senses, and the one (mind) and the five conceptual aspects of the senses, along with wish-dislike, pleasure-pain, the organic aggregation, vital intelligence, firmness as field along with its modifications and it has been said that nature is beginningless (XIII.19) and modifications and their intrinsic modalities are born of nature. We have proved in the book the five great elements, ego-sense, reason refer to the 7 names of the 14 Devatas. Verse XIII.21 states that the extent to which the spirit, which appreciates the modalities born of nature, gets associated with the modalities, becomes the cause of births in good or evil wombs. Spirit is the supervisor, permitter, supporter and experiencer whereas nature together with the intrinsic modalities, try to affect the spirit (XIII.22). If the modality is pure or sattvik, the spirit remains pure, if the modality is rajasik or tamasik, the spirit also shows similar traits, and depending on the state of the spirit when the body dies, it is decided whether it is pure enough to get united with the Divine Spirit or whether it has to take birth in good or bad wombs. This has been elaborately described in this Chapter. One who knows this relationship between spirit and nature, together with the intrinsic modalities, gets free from the cycle of rebirth (XIII.23). In fact, he becomes one with the Absolute Himself.

Surah Waqiya of Quran talks of three types of people, viz. people who moved ahead, people with actions in right hand and people with actions in left hand. Gita talks of the self getting united with the Divine Self and spirit taking birth in good or evil wombs. While ‘those who moved ahead’ of the Quran is same as those who are able to unite their self with the Manifest Self, people with actions in right and left hand should not be confused with those who were to take birth in good and bad wombs because of modalities of their actions. By the time the Divine Spirit of Truth, as prophesied by Jesus, descended on earth, which means to say that all the 14 Devatas who came into being from the One Noor created by Manifest Self descended one after another in the same region, the world had already entered the kaliyuga (the black age). The obedient atmas (selfs) had by this time already attained salvation by attuning their selfs to the Divine Self and those who were left on earth were the atmas which kept moving in good and bad wombs but could never attain the stage of purity that is necessary to attain union with Divine Self. 

Atmas have been sent on earth with mission to get out of the world through purifying the self and uniting it with the manifest self. The other way in which atma gets out is when it reaches such a nadir from where there can be no comig back and such an atma is removed from the world. What remains on earth are the atmas that have been unable to attain salvation and because of their afflictions to rajasik and tamasik modalities, about which we will read in this chapter, they continue to move between good and bad wombs, i.e. they continue taking birth in the form of various beings, depending on the state or level of the atma when it left the previous body. Since kaliyuga is to be succeeded by the end of the world, a special gift was given to Prophet Mohammad whereby there was to be no rebirth among those who accepted his true teachings. Such people, who accepted his true teachings, too remain afflicted to modalities. While some of these people must have surely attained the required purity and attained salvation, a lot many atmas surely must have been left behind who couldn’t attain the purity level that is necessary for salvation. Such people – at the time when their atma will leave the body - will be of two type viz. those whose good deeds outweigh the bad deeds (people with actions in right hand) and whose bad deeds outweigh the good deeds (people with actions in left hand). Such people will be tried on the Day of Judgment and sent to heaven or hell depending on their deeds. 

What is most important is to perform actions while keeping the remembrance of God alive. Such actions, performed under the influence of Forces of Noor or Light are said to be sattvik in nature. Actions performed with material intent are rajasik while those performed under the influence of Forces of Darkness are called tamasik in nature. These are the modalities of nature. 

There is another point that we need to bring forth! Take the case of the creation of Adam, which has been described in Old Testament (sacred to Jews and Christians) and Quran (sacred to Muslims). Hindu commentators claim that there is no concept of Adam given in their scriptures and their scriptures talk of higher concept. The higher concept they boast off is the presence of Paramatma, the Devatas, apsaras, etc. What we are seeing in our study is that these concepts are described in the books of Jews, Christians and Muslims as well, though not that elaborately. If the creation of Adam has not been described elaborately in Hindu scriptures, this does not mean that man was not created. Whoever was the first of man was Adam and his progeny was called Aadmi (mankind).

If we read the description in Old Testament and Quran, we find that when Adam was to be created, first his mould or skeleton was created from mud. It was left to dry. When it dried sufficiently, the spirit was blown into him, and Adam got up. Hindus might say why they should believe in the story when it is not given in their scriptures? They will have to believe when they see what happens to the body when the spirit leaves the body. It becomes a useless body, incapable of moving or even preserving for some time. After some time, it degrades to mix with soil once again. Therefore, it is essential to remember, for all times, that the real value is of the spirit inside us. The spirit leaves the body when the body becomes incapable to hold it and provide it the necessary nourishment. It could be due to some illness, failure of some organ, too much flow of blood or any such reason. When the body becomes incapable of holding the spirit, it is left with no choice but to find another body. The next body that the spirit chooses for itself depends on the state in which the spirit was at the time of leaving the previous body. 

Thus, it is clear that spirit is more important than the material body. Our mind or intellect makes the decisions; it decides whether the soul attaches itself to the spirit or it becomes attached to the material world outside the body. On this will depend whether the spirit in us remains move on the path of attaining purity or not.

Coming back to this Chapter, what we find is that the outline of the theory, which is going to be discussed in the present Chapter, was laid in the last Chapter. What follows in this Chapter is a further clarification of this theory of modalities of nature, and it may be said to be one of the important contributions of the Gita.

In this Chapter, there is not much discussion on the spirit in the body or its relationship with the Paramatma or the Supreme Spirit, whose role has already been elaborately defined in the previous Chapters. Instead, the modalities of nature are talked about in detail, which have a greater role to play, because whether the spirit remains pure at death and goes to unite with the Absolute or whether it has to take birth in good or bad wombs, depends on the modalities of nature that it is associated with. NG has described these modalities of nature as lower or bodily self: “This lower or bodily Self belongs to the domain of nature and necessity rather than to the free contingent spirit. As such it is subject to the modalities of nature as implied in the theory here. These modalities have, all of them, the effect of binding or conditioning the self. The self which is subject to natural bondage is not the higher self but one that is merely a “dweller in the body” or the “body owner” which is subject to birth, death, old age and sorrows. The three modalities refer only to this lower Self and, what is more, a man who conforms to the descriptions given in verses 22 to 25 at the end of this Chapter transcends the three modalities and becomes released from their binding force, and gains full spiritual status. The requirement laid down in verse 19 for crossing over the domain of the lower self, which is under the influence of the modalities to the higher, free and eternal Self, is very simple. He has only to see that there is no agent other than the modalities of nature, which keep him bound. Knowledge thus affects ready release. How a simple knowledge of this kind could win such a precious release is further explained in the last section of this Chapter as consisting of a certain attitude of neutrality or balance between opposites. The lower self which is given primacy in this Chapter and even referred to as the “basis of the Absolute” in verse 27 interacts with the higher or intelligent Self, and the overall wisdom about the two selfs establishes an equilibrium between them. This is the yoga or unitive discipline implied here. The primacy given to the lower self in this Chapter for purposes of discussion is quickly corrected, as we shall see in the next Chapter, where both the selfs are revalued in terms of a supreme Self called the Purushottama.”

If anybody had any more doubts, they get erased through the discussion in this Chapter. We have mentioned in our commentary of previous Chapter that even Dua-e-Kumayl – the supplication attributed to Imam Ali – talks of the Noors occupying the higher portions of all beings. This is the Supreme Self called the Purushottama, whose role in showing us the way has already been discussed. Our own self has two parts - higher or the intelligent self and lower or the animal self. In the book Bihar-ul-Anwar, there are sayings of the Ahlulbayt, wherein they talk of an extremely white part inside our body, which keeps getting blackened, with increasing number of sins. Ahlulbayt have also talked in detail about the animal self and the need to firmly keep it in control. Only then, movement to the higher self is possible. 

Now, Gita is talking of the lower self and how it gets attached to the three modalities. Need is to understand that it is the modalities of nature that do not allow a person to move to the higher self, even though this should be the ultimate aim of each person. Upanishads too have talked of the role of the fourteen Devatas inside us and said that they occupy the higher portions of the Self. Consciousness has been related to the Devatas - described as Purushotamas. This means that the person who performs actions or inactions that enable him to live in the higher self builds a direct relationship with the Devatas and through the Devatas, with the Manifest Self.

This makes it clear that the higher self inside us is directly attached to the fourteen Devatas, who form a link with the Manifest Self of God. Any person who is able to realize this relationship attains union with the Absolute. But to do so, it is utmost necessary to subdue the lower half of the self, which is governed by the modalities in nature. 

This lower self and its relationship with the modalities in nature, anger, greed and other material tendencies, is described in greater detail in this Chapter.

[1]

Sribhagavan said:

I shall again declare that superior wisdom, the best of all wisdom, by knowing which all sage-recluses (munis) have passed to transcendental perfection from here.

ACBSP writes in translation: 

The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: Again I shall declare to you this supreme wisdom, the best of all knowledge, knowing which all the sages have attained the supreme perfection.

We have seen that wisdom was the virtue that was associated with the Divine Spirit in the human body and all else was called ignorance in verse 11 of the previous Chapter. A man possessing wisdom alone is sure to know the relationship that exists between field and the knower of the field. It is expected that a wise man, who is aware of the virtues to be desired, will work towards achieving them. But the man is still governed by the modalities of his nature, which have the ability to sway his behaviour and lead him towards a path that is destructive for the well-being of his spirit. 

Superior wisdom talked about here means the ability of the man to cognize the various modalities of nature and then act, while keeping the modalities in check, so that the knowledge of the spirit that has been termed as wisdom is fully put to use and his self (atma) is able to attain the supreme perfection. But it is not an easy task as we have repeatedly said the atmas that remain are afflicted to one ailment or other. 

Writes NG: “After the thirteen Chapters have been covered, how such an important aspect of wisdom has been so far neglected, can only be explained by the fact that we are here entering into the domain of what was referred to as vijnana (specific or specialized aspect of wisdom) in IX.1. This specific quality of wisdom has now attained a maturity in the last four Chapters, so that the author is now able in this Chapter to confront the modalities of natural expression in the actual world of human values, which are not necessarily spiritual in the best or usual sense of the term, but yet deserve attention as belonging to the principle of a necessity which is also eternal.”

[2]

Having resorted to this wisdom, and having attained to conformity in (express) features pertaining to Me, they are neither born at creation nor are they adversely affected at dissolution.

ACBSP writes: 

By becoming fixed in this knowledge, one can attain to the transcendental nature like My own. Thus established, one is not born at the time of creation or disturbed at the time of dissolution.

The logic described is simple. God created a manifest nature of Himself in the form of a Manifest Self or the Higher Spirit (Paramatma), and all the rest of moving and non-moving creatures were created out of this Manifest Self. The Manifest Self or Higher Spirit is directly related to the higher portion of self in our bodies. This Self or Spirit has been described as the knower of the field and wisdom is linked to it. The lower self is governed by nature and its modalities. Those who are able to acquire the superior wisdom mentioned in verse 1 get free from repeated cycles of birth and their self gets united with the Supreme Self. Once the self gets united, the person cannot die, as the Self of the Supreme is eternal in nature. And even when the dissolution of the entire world will take place, that self or spirit of ours will continue to exist as part of the Supreme Self of God.

Question is how are they to acquire the superior wisdom that enables them to get freedom from repeated cycles of birth. It has been explicitly stated that it can be achieved by controlling the organs of senses and action, by controlling anger, lust, greed and other such illness that afflict the self. This Chapter also says that it can be achieved by recognizing the modalities of nature which do not allow us to come out of the lower self.  

However, there is another important point that should not be missed. Mere attaining of wisdom as regards to the relationship between one’s self and that of the Manifest Self of God is not enough. One has to attain conformity with the features pertaining to God, which have been described in the previous Chapter. Any one, who is able to accomplish these two things, attains union with the Manifest Self.

This conformity with the features pertaining to God is talked about on other occasions as well. Any person who reaches a certain degree of closeness with the Manifest Self of God starts showing the attributes of the Paramatma (Manifest Self) itself. The same is said in Hadees-e-Qudsi, wherein the God says: 

O My creation, follow my path. I will make you like Myself. I am Immortal. I will give you life that you will not die. I am Powerful. I will give you power that you won’t ever be dependent.

Is it not the fact that Hadees-e-Qudsi is referring to the same subject that Gita is addressing here? Important to note is that salvation is dependent on two things: knowledge of the Divine Creation Plan that passes from Devatas to Manifest Self to Absolute God and purity of self through subduing the modalities of nature and reaching a certain level of purity. This purity could be attained through various methods described earlier in Gita. 

[3]

My womb is great Brahma (supreme deity); in that I place the germ; thence is the birth of all beings, O Bharata (Arjuna).

What we have been talking about till this stage, about the Manifest nature of God, is being mentioned explicitly here. Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad, Isa Upanishad, Paingala Upanishad and several other religious scriptures sacred to the Hindus have mentioned this process elaborately. God decided to have a manifest form and created the Manifest Self. This Self underwent a process to create Brahma from whom the hiranyagarbha (the golden germ or embryo) evolved, which grew in size and then split into two – siva (masculine principle of the Absolute) and sakti (feminine principle of the Absolute) whose interaction led to creation of Devatas. It was due to the enormous devotion and worship that Devatas did, they were bestowed with the power of creating the phenomenal world. Thereafter they took the task of leading the entire mankind to the worship of the Absolute God, from whom the Devatas themselves had originated.

We have proved in the BOOK that Brahma is nothing but the original, undivided Noor created prior to all creations, which Mohammad called his own Noor. It is interesting to note that Mohammad was referring to that one Noor created before all creation and Ali being the other half of the Noor when Muslims knew nothing about the present of the same concepts in the books of the Hindus. Mohammad said on several occasions that his Noor was created before the creation of all beings. He has said that Ali and he himself were identical divisions of the same Noor. All through his life, he stressed that Fatima was part of him. In the BOOK, we have shown how the Upanishad too has used similar wordings to describe the origin of the Devatas. Thereafter, Upanishads talk of siva and sakti uniting to produce the rest of the Devatas, who became the guardians of the 14 spheres. The rest of the beings were created after the guardians had been appointed; what role the guardians had in this creation is not known as per the knowledge available to us. We have also seen that the Vedas have used Sakti, Parvati and several similar names for the Devi (Fatima). Time and again, we have also shown in the BOOK that Siva is none else but Ali’s Noor that got created from the original Noor, viz. Brahma. Since Siva had not taken birth in human form till then and the material tendency of men wanted something to worship, they started worshipping the linga, as they knew Noor of Siva was instrumental in the creation of the cosmos. Since Siva presided over 11 more Imams or Adityas (there are twelve Imams or Adityas in all), twelve such lingas were created. 

We have also said time and again that there was a particular period of evolution of mankind when these Devatas were introduced in all major civilizations of the world. Therefore, the same were introduced in the Greek, the Egyptian, the Mesopotamian and the Chinese civilizations, apart from introducing them among the Indo-Aryans. Most interestingly, even the Egyptian ancient folklore talks of a god with lingas all over his body. The same Egyptian folklore also talks of a Devi with two kids in her arms and more visible inside her enlarged belly, while the stories of Greek gods are very similar to the myths associated with characters of the Vedas.

It is this creation of fourteen beings from the parabrahma (supreme aspect of the Absolute) that is being talked about here. They all were alike to each other and also alike to the Brahma, from whom they originated. That is why Mohammad said on countless occasions that all of Ahlulbayt were Mohammad.

[4]

Whatever tangible forms are produced in all the wombs, O Son of Kunti (Arjuna), great Brahma (supreme deity) is their (common) womb and I am the seed-bestowing Father.

In the previous Chapter, it was mentioned that the Supreme Spirit remains associated with the spirits in all the animate and inanimate bodies. This verse makes it further clear how it is possible. Everything owes its origin to Brahma and is born of a common womb; the Manifest Self of God is the seed-bestowing father, who even created Brahma - the one Noor - which is called Noor-e-Mohammadi by the Muslims. The self in our bodies is a part of the Divine Self of Brahma, in such a manner that the Divine Self neither decreases when more selfs are born nor increases in size when a self comes back to get united with it. Ultimate aim of all spirits or selfs that have been created is to get united with the Divine Self. If a self is unable to reach a level that it gets united with the Divine Self upon the death of the body in which it remained, it has to take birth in good or bad wombs in future births. 

[5]

The pure-clear (sattva), the affective-active (rajas), and the inert-dark (tamas); these nature-necessity-born modalities (gunas) bind, O Mighty-armed (Arjuna), the imperishable embodied one.

ACBSP translates: 

Material nature consists of three modes – goodness, passion and ignorance. When the eternal living entity comes in contact with nature, O might-armed Arjuna, he becomes conditioned by these three modes.

The content of this verse has already been elaborated upon in our description of the previous Chapter and this Chapter up to this stage. If we go on to write about it again, it will merely be repetition of what has already been said.

NG writes that in Gita “these three modalities are applied not only to the subject of psychological types and problems of vocational guidance, but to schools of philosophic thought and to contemplative disciplines and attitudes in general. Even diet is not omitted.”

Unfortunately these three modalities are used to describe the four varnas (colours, divisions of society) and this has vitiated popular thought in India through centuries. What the people have not understood though is that the three modalities can never be passed on by birth. Each one of us is born carrying certain degrees of all three modalities viz. sattvik, rajasik and tamasik. The real test of the person is to transcend these modalities and acquire unity with the Higher Self. At all times, the Higher Self, which plays the role of providing consciousness, tries to show the right path to the person, whereas the natural forces tend to take the person from Higher Self to sattvik to rajasik to tamasik mode. If the Higher Self emerges victorious, the person attains salvation. On the other hand, if the natural forces emerge victorious, the person is unable to attain salvation. Majority of people fluctuate between sattvik and tamasik mode, while performing more of their acts in rajasik mode.

Fact is that those who prove the Varna system to be existing out of these modalities are themselves either in rajasik or tamasik mode but surely not in any higher mode.

Writes NG: “When we include deeper traits of the personality, to arrive at any such classification, we see in common life that the modalities mentioned here alternate and change over in the same person during the course of his growth or development as an individual, and even from moment to moment in his daily behaviour. Moreover, if we take the case of Arjuna’s own kshattriahood (warrior status) we find it true and valid only when the occasion of a righteous or absolutist war is present. Killing would be right for Arjuna at best for a few hours…

The three gunas (nature-modalities) should be viewed dynamically and not statically, as a triple-stranded regulative necessary principle which interferes with the flux of becoming and above all as something that still pertains to the relative side of life only, without having anything to do with spirituality properly understood. They are normative and not experimentally fixed in character. Above all they have to be understood only in conjunction with the objective counterparts belonging to each, without which they are absurd in themselves.

Such is the only sense of II.45 where Arjuna is asked to transcend the three nature-modalities and not to cultivate them. We can also see in this Chapter in verse 25 the recommending reference to gunatitah (one who has transcended the three modalities of nature).

We have already drawn attention to the fact that the Self is bound to necessity as implied in the word nibadhnanti (bind). Anything tending to bind the Self, however, even if the bondage is with a golden thread, cannot be called truly spiritual, because all spirituality implies release or freedom.

Even a person conforming to the highest or the purest modality of the three, the sattva guna, can lay claim at best only to an exalted form of holiness and not to true spirituality which is quite another thing.”

[6]

Of these, the pure-clear modality (sattva) from its purity, causing brightness and expressing normal well-being, binds by pleasure-conditioning and by knowledge-conditioning, O Sinless-One (Arjuna).

ACBSP has translated this as follows: 

O sinless one, the mode of goodness, being purer than the others, is illuminating, and it frees one from all sinful reactions. Those situated in that mode become conditioned by a sense of happiness and knowledge.

Stating in more precise terms what sattva (pure-clear modality or goodness) means, is the object of this verse. The word anamayam (normal well-being) suggests that the spirit conditioned by sattva (pure-clear modality or goodness) more or less shows the normal behaviour expected of a person. You may say this is the behaviour of a child, which shows tendency of justice, truthfulness, etc. Such a person conditions his self, either because of teachings or knowledge, to remain in that state itself. If you look around you will find several persons who dwell in this modality. They appear happy and contented, not because of their effort but because of the conditioning of their nature. The pull of the tamasik and rajasik modalities must surely be there but they are so conditioned that they continue to remain in sattvik mode. Since it has been said that the sattvik modality too is related to the lower self, it means that they still have to make effort to transcend this sattvik modality. This will be possible, as it has been said earlier, only when the person attains conformity in features pertaining to the Manifest Self. When this attempt is made, Zulmat uses it forces to pull the person back to lower modality.

There is one very interesting observation we wish to make. Outside of these modalities, we know now that there are two forces working on us, both from inside and outside. These are the Forces of Noor and Zulmat. The forces of Noor work on our consciousness and if they find a sincere will within us, as well as wisdom, they work to pull the person from being in tamasik mode to rajasik mode to sattvik mode and even higher. At all times, Zulmat works to pull the person from higher self to sattvik mode, then to rajasik and tamasik mode. 

While many of us continue to act in the mode in which our spirit is conditioned. For instance, we see a lot many people who spend their entire lives in rajasik mode with no attempt to perform certain actions in higher mode. There may be others who lead their lives in tamasik mode. Only when the person uses his intellect and start performing acts in higher mode than the status in which his self is that the self starts moving towards purity. That is due to the pull of the Noor or the higher self. When this happens, Zulmat too uses its forces to pull the self towards performing actions in the lower mode. 

From outside, it cannot be said what level the person is. Two persons may appear performing actions in rajasik mode, but it is possible that one is performing the action while on course to his ascent towards sattvik mode while the other may be performing action in rajasik mode while on course to his decline towards tamasik mode. Moreover, we also do not know how much of force Zulmat is using on which person. It is possible a person is in sattvik mode and Zulmat knowing fully that this person is incapable of moving ahead has left him there while it is possible a person appears to be performing acts in sattvik mode but Zulmat is using all its forces to pull him back and despite all those forces, he still stays in sattvik mode. 

But the real test of humanity to defeat all these negating forces and move on path that even transcends the modalities. We must however remember that it is even possible for Zulmat, at all the times, to pull back the person from the highest level, as it has been the case of Vishwamitra. Therefore, it is essential for the wayfarer of spiritual path not to allow even a bit of complacency so that Zulmat succeeds in pulling him back.

This logic further leads us to another observation, something that we have mentioned earlier as well. Lot many veils get removed from the eyes of a person who has transcended the modalities. There are some people who, when they reach this state, start claiming ‘An al-Haq’ (I am truth) or I am Brahman. If Rishis of yore made such statements, they surely were the guided ones. But today if someone makes a statement of this sort, even it is made after sincere realization that the person’s self has got united with truth, he should refrain as there is no guarantee that in future this person won’t be pull back from that lofty position. Zulmat is sure to use its maximum forces on pulling such a person back. 

[7]

Know you the affective-active modality (rajas) as being of the nature of attachment, conditioned by thirst for life and the adhering tendency; it binds fast, O Son of Kunti (Arjuna), the embodied one, by action-association.

ACBSP writes: 

The mode of passion is born of unlimited desires and longings, O son of Kunti, and because of this the embodied living entity is bound to material fruitive actions.

A man in rajasik (affective-active modality or passion) is attached to materialistic enjoyments and wishes to enjoy this life as full. This has a binding impact and it is difficult for such a person to come out of his attachment for material things. This is a person of the world and thinks of nothing more than benefits for this world alone. At no time does he realizes that all these associations are worldly in nature and the person is to leave them and move to the next life in the near future.

An increasingly large number of people are found attached to this modality.

[8]

But the inert-dark modality (tamas) know you, is born of ignorance, deluding all embodied beings; it binds, O Bharata (Arjuna), by delusion, lassitude and somnolence.

ACBSP writes: 

O son of Bharata, know that the mode of darkness, born of ignorance, is the delusion of all embodied living entities. The results of this mode are madness, indolence and sleep, which bind the conditioned soul.

The phrase sarvadehinam (all embodied beings) indicates that the tamasik modality too has a binding quality. This is perhaps the pure animal nature and is consequence of ignorance and of delusion, lassitude and somnolence. Animals and men can be equally included as representing this modality in nature. Even a brahmin or a saiyad, if he does not make an effort against natural inertia, is likely to get bound by it.

A man who performs actions in tamasik modality has been described to be dead. This is the reason why Gita described those in the opposite camp, in the battle of Mahabharata, as already dead. Quran too has described such people as dead and it is stated that such people are deaf, dumb and blind and there is only a remote chance of them getting out of this modality. 

Not that it is impossible to come out of this modality. In the BOOK, we have shown from the Vedas, the example of Hur in the battle of Karbala, who is a classic case of a person who came out of tamasik modality. However, there is not much chance of this happening in normal cases, as this modality is the consequence of ignorance, that too because the person does no attempt to come out of that ignorance. Violence, rape and other gross evils are inevitable consequences of being in this modality. Even if one kills or plunders in the name of religion, there is a greater chance that such a person is acting in tamasik modality even though he might be considering himself to be deeply religious. In fact, apparently the most piety filled religious rituals performed with great zeal and fervour can be in either of the three modalities. Even the religious priests, preachers and sadhus could be performing their actions in either of the three modalities.  

[9]

The pure-clear modality (sattva) conduces to pleasure, and the affective-active modality (rajas) to action, O Bharata (Arjuna), while the inert-dark modality (tamas), shrouding wisdom, conduces to delusion.

ACBSP’s translation is as follows: 

O son of Bharata, the mode of goodness conditions one to happiness; passion conditions one to fruitive action; and ignorance, covering one’s knowledge, binds one to madness.

NG elaborates: “Each modality is referred to here more briefly from the side of its expression rather than from its source, for diagnostic purposes. The confusion or delusion caused by the modality called tamas is here further explained. Mistaking one value for another, or getting confused generally through appearances and not being guided by realities which correct knowledge alone can bring – such is the expression by which this modality is to be recognized.”

One remarkable thing that is mentioned here is that the mode of ignorance even covers the person’s knowledge or wisdom, and despite his learning, he is unable to distinguish between good and bad. 

Let us give an example to show how a person may perform a same action in various modalities. Any action can fall into any of the three modes, depending on the thinking of the individual. Take for instance the example of a man performing exercise in the morning. This exercise can fall into any of the three modes. If the man performs the exercise keeping in mind that it is good for a long life and if he lives for a longer period, he would be able to take care of his children better – something that God has ordained for him - and might even live till the time of the arrival of the last Devata, his action will fall in the mode of sattvik. On the other hand, if he feels that he will look better and will consequently look more attractive to the opposite sex, this action will fall in the mode of rajasik. Likewise, if he feels that through exercise he will become powerful enough to suppress the people or kill a person from another community, the action falls in tamasik mode.

There is another category though, which is beyond these three modalities of nature. A person who has transcended the three modalities, will perform or not perform exercise but only for God.

[10]

Now the pure-clear modality (sattva) dominates, overpowering the affective-active (rajas) and the inert-dark (tamas); and the affective-active (rajas) over the pure-clear (sattva) and the inert-dark (tamas); likewise the inert-dark (tamas) over the pure-clear (sattva) and the affective-active (rajas), O Bharata (Arjuna).

ACBSP translates: 

Sometimes the mode of goodness becomes prominent, defeating the modes of passion and ignorance, O son of Bharata. Sometimes the mode of passion defeats goodness and ignorance, and at other times ignorance defeats goodness and passion. In this way there is always competition for supremacy.

We have already mentioned that the three modes are not of permanent nature and one keeps dominating the other at different times. All three modalities are present in a person and only difference between one and another is which modality is dominating in which person. 

The real test of a being is to transcend these modes, by completely subduing the modalities of nature. Once the modalities are transcended, then the Manifest Self within our self starts showing its effect. The consequence of this is that the person starts showing the virtues that God possesses. 

[11]

When light which is wisdom streams forth from all the doors of the body, then it may be understood that the pure-clear modality (sattva) is predominant.

ACBSP translates: 

The manifestations of the mode of goodness can be experienced when all the gates of the body are illuminated by knowledge.

To transcend the modalities of nature is not easy. For those who are unable to do so, it is always better to remain in the pure-clear (sattvik) modality. Such a person appears to be full of wisdom and knowledge.

NG says: “The gates of the body referred to here are the indriyas (sense organs) which put the body in living touch with their corresponding objects of perception. Consciousness consists of both subject and object and, as consciousness is comparable to light, here it is stated that when the healthy spirit belonging to nature and pertaining to necessity, expresses itself normally there is a fullness of consciousness in relation to the various senses which may be said to be doors or windows of the soul.”

ACBSB has equated the nine gates to the nine openings in the body. This appears incorrect! Because he has counted nostrils as two, ears as two, but genitals as one, both for men and women. However, NG’s arguments equating the gates with indriyas appear to be correct. 

See how ACBSP describes this: “There are nine gates in the body: two eyes, two ears, two nostrils, the mouth, the genitals and the anus. When every gate is illuminated by the symptoms of goodness, it should be understood that one has developed the mode of goodness. In the mode of goodness, one can see things in the right position, one can hear things in the right position, and one can taste things in the right position. One becomes cleansed inside and outside. In every gate there is development of the symptoms of happiness, and that is the position of goodness.”

It is also possible that the nine gates are those which are described in verses 5-6 of the previous Chapter which talks about the ten senses, and the one (mind) and the five conceptual aspects of the senses, wish-dislike, pleasure-pain, the organic aggregation, vital intelligence and firmness. God knows better!

In the properly human context sattvik (pure-clear) well-being, though it applies to the bodily side, can reflect on the mind and be conducive to brilliancy of intelligence and keeping the doors mentioned above illuminated.

At this juncture, we are reminded of a saying of the Prophet Mohammad who said: “I am the city of knowledge and Ali is its gate”, thereby meaning anybody seeking knowledge will have to come through Ali. Likewise, anybody seeking to remain in sattvik mode will have to keep the aforementioned gates of the body pure and illuminated. Knowledge and wisdom to do so will come from the Devatas, including Ali.

[12]

When the affective-active modality (rajas) dominates, there arises greed, activity, initiation of works, impatience, and covetousness, O Best of Bharatas (Arjuna).

ACBSP’s translation: 

O chief of the Bharatas, when there is an increase in the mode of passion the symptoms of great attachment, fruitive activity, intense endeavour, and uncontrollable desire and hankering develop.

From the enumeration of the symptoms of a man in whom rajas (affective-active modality) is dominant, we find qualities that involve a relation with an outside object or value. The interest here may be said to be horizontally directed towards things in the world, such as goods or possessions. 

Says ACBSP: “One in the mode of passion is never satisfied with the position he has already acquired: he hankers to increase his position. If he wants to construct a residential house, he tries his best to have a palatial house, as if he would be able to reside in that house eternally. And he develops a great hankering for sense gratification. There is no end to sense gratification. He always wants to remain with his family and in his house and to continue the process of sense gratification. There is no cessation of this. All these symptoms should be understood as characteristics of the mode of passion.”

[13]

When the inert-dark modality (tamas) dominates, dullness, lack of initiative, delusion, infatuation arise, O Joy of the Kurus (Arjuna).

ACBSP translates:

When there is an increase in the mode of ignorance, O son of Kuru, darkness, inertia, madness and illusion are manifested.

Writes NG: “Even here we can see that the diagnostic qualities of a tamasik (inert-dark) person do not conform even to the minimal requirements of a good servant, who cannot be at least without some initiative in his work.” On the contrary, Gita wants each of its believers to constantly perform actions even for the betterment of the society. It goes to the extent of even calling its adherents to wage a righteous war on all kinds of evil, inhuman, unjust and non-righteous thinking and forces. 

Judging by the lofty standards that Paramatma wants us to maintain, we are sure that he would not have allowed anybody, but the Purushottams, or at best those in the sattvik mode, to be on his side in the war of Mahabharata. How sorrowful that the commentators call Mahabharata a war for acquiring the lost kingdom, which is altogether against the values taught by Gita.

Let us all introspect and see whether we are worthy of being on the side of Krishna, if he decides to come again in this world, to lead us to the right path. Kalki Avatar or Mahdi is about to come. Let’s prepare for his coming!

[14-15]

If the body-bearer goes to dissolution when the pure-clear modality (sattva) predominates, then it attains to the pure worlds of those who understand the best (values).

Meeting with dissolution when the affective-active modality (rajas) dominates, he is born among those attached to action; and likewise if dissolved in (a state of) inert-dark modality (tamas) he is born in the wombs of the foolish.

ACBSP has translated these two verses as follows:

When one dies in the mode of goodness, he attains to the pure higher planets of the great sages.

When one dies in the mode of passion, he takes birth among those engaged in fruitive activities and when one dies in the mode of ignorance, he takes birth in the animal kingdom.

NG comments: “In the case of rajasik (affective-active) and the tamasik (inert-dark) men, the worlds in which they are to be born seem to be the earth that we are familiar with, but in the case of the man in whom sattva (pure-clear) predominates, it is not clear whether the superior values attained in the pure worlds belong to the immanent or the transcendent order.” 

We differ with NG here! The test is here in this world and not in any other world. If the person has been able to transcend the modalities, even then he will live and die in this world alone. It’s true that when the spirit leaves his body, it is in a stage where it has transcended the modes, then there will be no coming back for him. For someone who dies with self in either of sattvik, rajasik or tamasik mode, there is no salvation. Such a spirit will need a body until it is ready for exit or the world ends.

The highest position, as per Gita, is to attain the state where the self gets united with the Manifest Self. Such a self never dies because it has become one with the Divine Self. Only those who have transcended the three modalities would fall into this category. 

[16]

The benefit of good action is said to be pure-clear (sattvik) and pure; while the benefit of the affective-active modality (rajas) is pain; and ignorance the benefit of the inert-dark modality (tamas).

ACBSP has translated this as follows: 

The result of pious action is pure and is said to be in the mode of goodness. But action done in the mode of passion results in misery, and action performed in the mode of ignorance results in foolishness.

Instead of going from effect to cause, here we trace the effect from the cause. Otherwise, the meanings are same as discussed before. 

ACBSP has here given a long narration about ignorance being killing animals or particularly the cows and even goes on to prove that just as the human law gives death as penalty for killing man, there must be some punishment for killing animals in the state controlled by the Supreme Lord. “So indulgence in animal killing for the taste of the tongue is the grossest kind of ignorance,” says he.

It is sad indeed that in spite of talking about serious subjects that Gita dwells in, ACBSP continues to dwell on lesser significant aspects. Killing an innocent animal is surely wrong. Ali has strongly advised his followers to desist from making their stomachs a storehouse of dead animals. Prophet Mohammad has even refrained his followers from plucking leaves unnecessarily. Yet he has not stopped animal killing altogether. This is so because Islam was presented as a law for the entire humanity, who are living in all regions of the world, and not just for those living in the Gangetic plains of India. 

Tell a Brahmin from Kashmir to desist from eating meat and he might say it is not about religion but about the conditions in which he lives. Likewise, tell somebody in Rajasthan or the desert of Arabia, and he might even be ready to leave your company than accept what you are saying. Read Robinson Crusoe and you will realize that there can be situations when one has no option but to eat meat. Crusoe had to plan to kill animals even when the place abounded in grapes, because he had read that merely eating the grapes could make a man insane. Moreover, poor people have no source of nourishment but through easily available meat.

However, this does not mean this writer is supporting consumption of meat. If at any stage of his spiritual elevation, if the wayfarer feels becoming vegetarian would help him attain his objective, he should surely do so. But more than being vegetarian or non-vegetarian, there are other factors which are essential for attaining self-realization and it is within reach for people of both these habits to attain salvation, if they really strive for it.

It is sad that ACBSP talks about such subjects and ignores the real issues that Gita points out. Do not be unjust to others, don’t get involved in theft even if it is white collared theft, don’t promote corruption, be humane in approach, don’t kill others, don’t usurp other’s property, don’t fall for materialistic desire, and so on. People who themselves would have been removed from their company by Krishna due to their unrighteous deeds, had they lived in Krishna’s time, are considered acceptable because it is from amongst them that the major donors come to organizations like ISKCON and others. 

A sincere attempt is needed to take the people back to righteousness and leading a way of life authenticated by Gita. But that is missing! And mere chanting of ‘Hare Krishna’, preferably while dancing or sitting in a trance, is being projected as bhakti (devotion), which has to be necessarily accompanied by gifts to the institution or acquiring its membership by paying a fixed fee. If you are too poor to do all this, there are other temples where you can go and show your devotion. Decide for yourself in which mode will all this fall?

[17]

From the pure-clear modality (sattva) arises wisdom; as also from the affective-active modality (rajas) greed; and both delusion and infatuation and also ignorance from the inert-dark modality (tamas).

ACBSP translates: 

From the mode of goodness, real knowledge develops; from the mode of passion, greed develops; and from the mode of ignorance develops foolishness, madness and illusion.

The same operation of equating the three modalities with their counterparts is carried out here as a slight variant to the others. Cause and effect are treated more unitively.

[18]

Those who abide in the pure-clear modality (sattva) go upwards; the affective-active (rajasik) dwell in the middle, and the inert-dark (tamasik) abiding in the function of the lowest modality of nature, go downwards.

See ACBSP’s translation: 

Those situated in the mode of goodness go upward to the higher planets; those in the mode of passion live on the earthly planets; and those in the abominable mode of ignorance go down to the hellish worlds.

Writes NG: “This verse restates the same verity in terms of high and low values. The ambivalence represented by the three modalities of nature which were somewhat veiled by being judged in the light of their diagnostic marks or expressions, now emerges in its proper symmetry of opposition.

There are ordinary middle-state values from which we could have arrows representing a series of sattvik (pure-clear) values that may be said to ascend a scale upwards; and correspondingly there is a downward scale, reaching to the lowest values known to man, here referred to by the expression jaghanyagunavrittistha (abiding in the function of the very lowest modality of nature). It goes without saying that the middle values belong to the rajasik (affective-active) modality.”

But what does all this mean? Does the person who abides in the pure-clear modality climb some stairs? No! The person who abides in the pure-clear modality gets a better birth in the next life. If you recall, the earlier Chapters have even said that getting birth in the family of the Devatas is extremely rare. That is perhaps the highest climb of a person who has spent his life in sattvik mode. Those who die in the rajasik mode continue to take birth in middle societies, while those who perform more of tamasik deeds take birth in inferior castes or bodies. That is why, it was said in one of earlier chapters that the wise treat the Brahman as well as a dog and a dog-eater equally. You never know what a Brahman of this birth would become in the next. 

Those who created caste system should know that all men are equal in the sense that everybody who is living, even if he is a brahmin or a saiyad, has not been able to attain salvation until now. None of us have cause to rejoice. We should feel sorry that our selfs are afflicted with one or the other disease, which has not allowed us to attain salvation, despite the fact that so many Messengers and Avatars have arrived in the past. Likewise, we should know that it is possible for a person in the lowest birth to attain salvation within this birth itself while it is possible for a Brahmin to fall to the level that he gets birth of a dog or a dog-eater in the next life.

Ultimate aim is not to live life in sattvik mode but to transcend this as well and attain union with the Manifest Self of God. This state is described as nijaat by Prophet Mohammad. What does this mean when we have already said that the Manifest Self of God continues to remain present in all beings? This means that the person transcends the modalities of nature, which are present in his lower self, and aligns his lower self with the Higher Self inside him. Once the person is able to do so, he starts showing the characteristics of God in his acts and deeds. Such a person attains union with the Absolute through acquiring union with the Manifest Self inside him. 

Such persons reach such high level of spirituality that they start showing superhuman characteristics. But that does not mean we start worshipping them, as it happened with the case of people like Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Nizamuddin Aulia or Sai Baba. All that they did was for their own good. They might or might not have attained union with the Absolute. We are not in position to comment on that as this is something that only God and the Devatas know. However, considering the fact that prayers are heard even at their doorsteps make us conclude that they must have attained the cherished goal. For us, it is in our interest that we try to attain that union for ourselves, so that we too are able to transcend repeated rebirths and attain a permanent place in the highest levels of heaven. Instead of seeking from them, the desired way is that our self reach a level of purity where what we wish comes true. 

[19]

When the seer beholds no other agent than the modalities of nature, and knows that which lies beyond the modalities, he attains to My state of being.

ACBSP translates: 

When one properly sees that in all activities no other performer is at work than these modes of nature and he knows the Supreme Lord, who is transcendental to all these modes, he attains My spiritual nature.

The Chapter had started with conversation about superior wisdom, by knowing which all sage-recluses have passed to transcendental perfection from this world. Such men are neither born at creation nor are they adversely affected at dissolution. This is so because they attain union with the Absolute.

Then conversation moved to those who worship the Manifest form of God and it was said that all beings are created from one womb and possess nature-necessity-born modalities (gunas). These were the lesser mortals, who were subjected to the modalities of nature. 

Conversation now again moves to that cherished state belonging to the transcendental aspect of attaining union with the Absolute, referred to here as gunebhyah param (lying beyond the modalities). 

It is said that the seer beholds no other agent than the modalities of nature, and knows that which lies beyond the modalities. Purport is that a man who considers all actions as belonging to the modalities and knows that salvation in the form of attaining union with the Manifest form of God and the Absolute exists beyond it, will only perform the actions that are necessary, that too with a degree of detachment and not seeking any fruit of actions. When he is conscious of the material body, he acts only for sense gratification, but when he has realized only the Supreme God as truth, sense gratification automatically stops. He does not need this material body and he does not need to accept the dictates of the material body. He does not desires to enjoy the body, nor does he desires to get out of it. Thus transcendentally situated, the devotee becomes automatically free. 

Such a person realizes the Supreme God and attains to the state of being united with the Absolute God. And does not have to take birth again, neither in good nor in bad wombs.

[20]

The embodied, having transcended these three modalities of nature, originating in the body, is freed from sufferings of birth, death and old age, and enjoys immortality.

See ACBSP’s translation: 

When the embodied being is able to transcend these three modes associated with the material body, he can become free from birth, death, old age and their distresses and an enjoy nectar even in this life.

This is what each of us should aspire for.

[21]

Arjuna said:

By what marks, O Master, does he who has transcended those three modalities of nature become (recognized)? What (is his) conduct and how does he transcend those three modalities of nature?

ACBSP’s translation: 

Arjuna inquired: O my dear Lord, by which symptoms is one known who is transcendental to these three modes? What is his behaviour? And how does he transcend the modes of nature?

Arjuna asks a question on the same topic which has been partially covered already, for a fuller philosophical discussion of the implications of the theory of the three modalities of nature when it is given its proper place in the larger context of wisdom. He asks for the signs or marks of a person who has transcended the three modalities.

[22-25]

Sribhagavan said:

Light and activity and delusion when present, O Pandava (Arjuna), he is not dissatisfied nor hankers for them when absent.

He who, seated as a neutral, is not moved by the modalities of nature; who, thinking that the modalities of nature operate in rotation, who, standing apart is unmoved;

the same in pain and pleasure, at rest in himself,  to whom a clod of earth and a stone and gold are alike; firm in attitude (alike) to loved and unloved; who regards his being blamed or praised equally;

the same in honour and disgrace; taking no sides as between friends or foes, abandoning all initiation of works – he is said to have transcended the modalities of nature (gunas).

Now see how ACBSP has translated these verses;

The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: O son of Pandu, he who does not hate illumination, attachment and delusion when they are present or long for them when they disappear; who is unwavering and undisturbed through all these reactions of the material qualities, remaining neutral and transcendental, knowing that the modes alone are active; who is situated in the self and regards alike happiness and distress; who looks upon a lump of earth, a stone and a piece of gold with an equal eye; who is equal toward the desirable and the undesirable; who is steady, situated equally well in praise and blame, honour and dishonour; who treats alike both friend and enemy; and who has renounced all material activities – such a person is said to have transcended the modes of nature.

Commenting on these verses, NG writes: “Light, energy and delusion are the conditioning factors of the bhutatman (existential or elemental Self). The yogi under reference here who has transcended the gunas (nature-modalities) is able to deal with that aspect of his own self which is under sway of these modalities, together with the other higher aspect of his own Self independent of these modalities, he latter being merely perceptual in its character. By treating these two aspects on an equal footing it is suggested in this verse that a yogi transcends the modalities. He is indifferent to the working of the modalities and to whatever conditionings or necessary types they might imply.”

This explains why Krishna talks of peace and harmony all through Gita, then leads Arjuna to the recognition of the Absolute God and then asks him to fight telling that it is his duty to fight and he will be committing sin if he shirks the responsibility. He asks Arjuna to fight while remaining neutral and unconcerned about consequences, detached from emotions and without considerations of reward or fame and remaining disaffiliated from all material attractions. This is so because God wants the believers of Gita to live within this world and not to go to remote places as sanyasins, as the present-day concept is, work ceaselessly to remove injustice, evil and disharmony from the face of this world, and personally take refuge only and only in the Absolute God.

These three verses together constitute what might be called a full definition of one who has transcended the three gunas (modalities). 

[26]

He also serves me with a yoga of devotion, never deviating from the proper path, transcending these modalities of nature, he is considered fit for becoming the Absolute.

ACBSP’s translation is as follows: 

One who engages in full devotional service, unfailing in all circumstances, at once transcends the modes of material nature and thus comes to the level of Brahman.

NG here deviates from the true meaning as implied by Gita when he says: “This verse hearkens back from the discussion of the modalities to the familiar note of bhakti (devotion) pertaining to the Bhagavatas of the Vasudeva religion. The strict bipolar relation to be established with Krishna as a representative of the Absolute is the teaching running through the Gita as a kind of refrain.”

Those reading this commentary must have surely realized by now that all that is happening in the name of religion is not correct or sanctified by religion. The mistake that NG has committed here is to try to understand the word ‘devotion’ from the devotion that is practiced today. How can we be sure that this is the right form of devotion?

In fact the highest form of devotion which is performed today pertains to inflicting injuries on the body, going without food for days, or doing tapasya while standing on a feet, or remaining standing or sitting in a particular position for months. All these are severally criticized by God later in Gita and referred to as tamasik modality. What NG is saying is akin to giving milk to the idols to drink when Krishna talks of serving the Absolute God as well as the Manifest Self, with a yoga of devotion. In fact, never deviating from the proper path and transcending the modalities of nature itself will be acts of serving the Manifest Self. This is so because we have already seen that this alone was the purpose of creation of the Manifest Self. 

Devotion applied in Gita means sincerity or continuity. The devotee serves the Absolute God with sincerity, never deviating from the proper path, and transcending the modalities of nature, as has been talked about. Such a person is considered fit for becoming one like the Absolute. Consequently, he starts showing the characteristics of God in his personality.

[27]

For I am the basis of the Absolute and the unexpended nectar of immortality, and the eternal way of right conduct, and of lonely final happiness.

ACBSP translates as follows: 

And I am the basis of the impersonal Brahman, which is immortal, imperishable and eternal and is the constitutional position of ultimate happiness.

Absolute God alone has to be the final goal. Only in Him should one take refuge. Only then will a person attain immortality upon death or will ceaselessly remain on the right path performing the right deeds while alive. God alone is the ultimate source of all happiness. Come, we welcome all of you! Come under the refuge of the Absolute; come to the fold of the religion of the Absolute; bow down only to Him; worship Him alone and perform all your worldly acts while realizing Him and remembering that it is to Him that we have to return. 

To Him, all are His creations; if you love Him truly see to it that the rights of some are not being trespassed by others. His soul dwells in all, if you believe in it, see to it that no soul is given cause to lament. He is just and expects you to not only do justice to all but raise your voice against all forms of injustice. If the atma gets corrupt He does not allow it to come back to Him; consequently the atma has no choice but to continue dwelling in the bodies of others, yet you have accepted corruption as a way of life. He has created harmony in every aspect of nature, therefore don’t allow anybody to create disharmony amongst human beings. If you allow all this to happen, and yet wish yourself to be called a devotee of God, read Gita again, because Krishna won’t accept you on his side. 

Come, let’s work to make this world a better place to live so that even if we were to be the unfortunate ones to be born again in good or bad womb, we won’t be treated as badly as several men of our period are being treated today, without having any resource to plea for justice or fair treatment, nobody to care for them, nobody to give them food or shelter, and nobody to wipe out tears from their eyes in the name of humanity.


Thus ends in the Upanishads of the Songs of God, in the Science of the Wisdom of the Absolute, in the Dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna, the Fourteenth Chapter entitled The Unitive Way of Transcending the Three Nature-Modalities.


Gita Saar - A Muslim Perspective Part 1-N: Chapter - XIII - Unitive Understanding of the Distinction between the Actual and the Perceptual (Kshetra-Kshetrajna-Vibhaga Yoga)

Chapter - XIII

UNITIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ACTUAL AND THE PERCEPTUAL 

(Kshetra-Kshetrajna-Vibhaga Yoga)

ACBSP, we have said before, has misunderstood Gita. He writes: “In the first six chapters of Bhagavada-Gita the knower of the body (the living entity) and the position by which he can understand the Supreme Lord are described. In the middle six chapters of the Bhagavad-gita the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the relationship between the individual soul and the Supersoul in regard to devotional service are described. The superior position of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the subordinate position of the individual soul are definitely defined in these chapters. The living entities are subordinate under all circumstances, but in their forgetfulness they are suffering. When enlightened by pious activities, they approach the Supreme Lord in different capacities – as the distressed, those in want of money, the inquisitive, and those in search of knowledge. That is also described. Now, starting with the Thirteenth Chapter, how the living entity comes into contact with material nature and how he is delivered by the Supreme Lord through the different methods of fruitive activities, cultivation of knowledge, and the discharge of devotional service are explained. Although the living entity is completely different from the material body, he somehow becomes related. This also is explained.”

Writes NG: “This Chapter is concerned with one of the most difficult problems, one which has puzzled not only philosophers and psychologists, but even practical men of affairs. Arjuna puts the question under three couples of concepts; one pair being based on the idea of prakriti (nature) of which the counterpart in the Samkhya (rationalist) philosophy is the purusha (spirit); another pair is based on the concept of what is here named kshetra (the field), i.e. actuality, and the kshetrajna (one who knows the field), the perceptual counterpart of actuality; while the third pair which belongs more to a subtler philosophical order, jneyam (that which is to be known) has its counterpart in jnanam (knowledge or wisdom).

In the first place we find that concepts belonging to branches of knowledge which are generally considered widely apart are here seen as brought together for purposes of general treatment of a special kind in keeping with the development of the subject-matter of the Gita.

The field and the knower of the field may be said to belong to the world of action; the concepts of nature and spirit to the duality implied in Samkhya (rationalist) philosophy; and that which is to be known to epistemology, whose problems are to be mixed up with action or nature.

We have found that whole Chapters have already been devoted to subjects such as Samkhya (Chapter II), action (Chapter III) and wisdom (Chapter IV). When such an opportunity has been availed of already for dealing with these subjects in extenso it may be legitimate to ask why these subjects are now taken again in pairs belonging to each context for a juxtaposed treatment together, in one Chapter.

The earlier Chapters referred to these subjects only in a preliminary fashion. The discussion had to be built up step by step, settling initial doubts and silencing critics. We have noticed how, in the middle of the work, in Chapters VIII, IX and X, the Gita enunciated and explained its own version of what is explicitly referred to as adhyatma (pertaining to the Self (atma), the principle of the Self (atma), i.e. Self-science). The peculiarity to these central Chapters, we have noticed, was the perfect neutrality as between the transcendental and the immanent which was maintained in the discussion. The Self was a central value around which the notion of the Absolute was developed.”

Let us now see what this Chapter has to say.

[0]

Arjuna said:

Nature and spirit; the field and the knower of the field; knowledge (wisdom) and what is to be known; these I should like to know, O Kesava (Krishna).

ACBSP’s translation is as follows: 

O my dear Krishna, I wish to know about prakriti (nature), purusa (the enjoyer), and the field and the knower of the field, and of knowledge and the object of knowledge.

As in the last Chapter, Arjuna takes the initiative in putting the composite question. It is clear that he is progressing in his pursuit of quenching his thirst for knowledge but certain positive aspects of wisdom are still the objects of his inquiry. Knowledge itself as a proper subject requires to be understood as a systematic whole, as belonging to a definite body of philosophic wisdom. The word jneyam (what is to be known) shows that knowledge is here presented not merely subjectively, but more consciously, positively or objectively.

The reason for treating this verse as verse 0 (zero) is given by NG in the following words: “With a view to conformity between different editions and following the example of some other editions, we are not including this opening verse in the serial numbering, for the reason that the Gita traditionally is supposed to consist of 700 verses. This verse added would make 701. Inasmuch as this verse is of the nature of a title only, and could safely be omitted without interfering with the subject-matter, and as it could have been added as an afterthought by someone other than Vyasa himself, its exclusion can perhaps be justified.”

[1]

Sribhagavan said:

This body, O Kaunteya (Arjuna), is called the field, and he who knows this, thus they call, who know, the knower of the field.

ACBSP translates: 

The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: This body, O son of Kunti, is called the field, and one who knows this body is called the knower of the field.

ACBSP further elaborates: “Arjuna was inquisitive about prakriti (nature), purusha (the enjoyer), kshetra (the field), kshetra-jana (its knower), and knowledge and the object of knowledge. When he inquired about all these, Krishna said that this body is called the field and that one who knows this body is called the knower of the field. This body is the field of activity for the conditioned soul. The conditioned soul is entrapped in material existence, and he attempts to lord it over material nature. And so, according to his capacity to dominate material nature, he gets a field of activity. That field of activity is the body. And that is the body? The body is made of senses. The conditioned soul wants to enjoy sense gratification, and, according to his capacity to enjoy sense gratification, he is offered a body, or field of activity. Therefore the body is called kshetra, or the field of activity for the conditioned soul. Now, the person who identifies himself with the body is called kshetra-jana, the knower of the field. It is not very difficult to understand the difference between the field and its knower, the body and the knower of the body. Any person can consider that from childhood to old age he undergoes so many changes of body and yet is still one person, remaining. Thus there is a difference between the knower of the field of activities and the actual field of activities. A living conditioned soul can thus understand that he is different from the body. It is described in the beginning – dehino `smin – that the living entity is within the body and that the body is changing from childhood to boyhood and from boyhood to youth and from youth to old age, and the person who owns the body knows that the body is changing. The owner is distinctly kshetra-jana. Sometimes we think, “I am happy,” “I am a man,” “I am a woman,” “I am a dog,” “I am a cat.” These are the bodily designations of the knower. But the knower is different from the body. Although we may use many articles – our clothes, etc. – we know that we are different from the things used. Similarly, we also understand by a little contemplation that we are different from the body. I or you or anyone else who owns the body is called kshetra-jana, the knower of the field of activities, and the body is called kshetra, the field of activities itself.”

ACBSP is right in his initial observations but from this description, all physicians, who know the human body better than the rest of the human beings, can be called ‘knowers of the body’. Even though science has tried to understand the process of growth, from the state of childhood to old age, there are still a lot many things that need to be known. For instance, we know nothing about the mind and how it functions. Also, we know nothing about spirit inside us. Likewise, our knowledge of the self too is minimal, even though its knowledge has been described as the greatest of all sciences.

It is interesting to note that Arjuna’s question had mentioned nature and spirit first and the field and the knower of the field followed this. In reply, Krishna started talking about the body and the knower of the body first. Body is the field. Unlike what several people would like to believe, the body is a very vast subject of study and includes the study of nature and spirit as well. One who knows this is the knower of the body. Such a person keeps firm control over all his organs of action and senses.

[2]

And also know Me as the knower of the field in all fields, O Bharata (Arjuna); that knowledge (which refers to the knowledge) of the field and the knower of the field, that, in my opinion, is the knowledge.

ACBSP says this in translation: 

O scion of Bharata, you should understand that I am also the knower in all bodies, and to understand this body and its knower is called knowledge. That is My opinion.

While discussing the subject of the body and the knower of the body, God says that He is the Supreme knower of all bodies, owing to the reason that He alone is the Creator and knows far more about body characteristics, the nature of individuals and the manner in which each body part functions, including the mind, the spirit and the self, and no human knowledge despite all scientific and social advances can ever equal His knowledge. 

One who knows the nature of not one but all the bodies of human beings and all the various species of life can only frame the Perfect Laws for governing of the society. Laws made by man suffer from various discrepancies – man is still in the process of understanding the functioning of the body and its nature fully; each man has certain flaws and is governed by material nature to some levels, laws created by such men for the rest of the society may reflect the flaws of those men who created them; and are made only keeping in mind a limited area, a limited time frame or a limited set of people, whereas God’s laws are universal and have the same modifying effect on the individuals and the society in all times.

Take for instance the cover story in Hindustan Times dated September 27, 2004 titled ‘Diseases have a gender bias’. The story starts with this: “Beyond the tired clichés and sperm-and-egg basics taught in grade school science class, researchers are discovering that men and women are even more different than anyone realized… These discoveries are part of a quiet but revolutionary change infiltrating US medicine as a growing number of scientists realize there’s more to women’s health than just the anatomy that makes them female, and that the same diseases often affect men and women in different ways. 

“Women are different than men not only psychologically (but) physiologically, and I think we need to understand those differences,” says Dr. Catherine DeAngelis, editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association.””

Isn’t this discovery far more different to the stand that various bra-burning feminists had been taking till now? Does equal treatment to animals justifies lion and deer being put in the same cage? Are men capable of giving birth to children? If not so, why don’t we accept that men and women differ physically, physiologically, psychologically and hence have different needs; hence equality does not mean equal number of jobs in army? Equal treatment has to be spiritual and psychological in nature than physical. It has to be based on the nature of the personality. And till the time we are not sure about our expertise on knowledge, which keeps changing from day-to-day, let us accept that the best laws can only be made by the Creator and neither by common man, nor by a group of them.

Writes ACBSP aptly: “A citizen may know everything about his patch of land, but the king knows not only his palace but all the properties possessed by the individual citizens. Similarly, one may be the proprietor of the body individually, but the Supreme Lord or Manifested Self is the proprietor of all bodies. The king is the original proprietor of the kingdom, and the citizen is the secondary proprietor. Similarly, the Supreme Lord is the supreme proprietor of all bodies…”

This also confirms that since the Creator is in the best knowledge of our body, it is the Creator who is in best position to give laws for the humans. 

ACBSP further writes: “In this Chapter it will also be explained that out of the two knowers, one is fallible and the other is infallible. One is superior and the other is subordinate. One who understands the two knowers of the field to be one and the same contradicts the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who states here very clearly, “I am also the knower of the field of activity.” One who misunderstands a rope to be a serpent is not in knowledge. There are different kinds of bodies, and there are different owners of the bodies. Because each individual soul has his individual capacity for lording it over material nature, there are different bodies. But the supreme also is present in them as the controller. The word ca is significant, for it indicates the total number of bodies.” 

That is why the real knowledge is to know the body and the knower in all bodies i.e. the relationship of the Supreme God and the individuals. 

We have noticed that at another point in Gita, it has been stated that the real science is the knowledge of the self. We know that till date, despite all advances in science, man has not been able to understand the composition of his self at all. When he has not been able to understand self, he has also not understood the relationship that exists between self in a man, to that of the Divine Souls (atmas) of the Devatas and eventually the Manifest Self and the Absolute God. In such a scenario, it is imperative on human beings to follow the laws given by the God blindly, as God alone knows the nature of body, self, soul and spirit thoroughly.

[3]

(That) hear in brief from Me; what the field is, what it is like, of what it is the modification, and whence, and which (it is), also what he (the knower of the field) is, and what is his specialized resulting expression.

ACBSP writes: 

Now please hear my brief description of this field of activity and how it is constituted, what its changes are, whence it is produced, who that knower of the field of activities is, and what his influences are.

ACBSP further writes: “The Lord is describing the field of activities and the knower of the field of activities in their constitutional positions. One has to know how this body is constituted, the materials of which this body is made, under whose control this body is working, how the changes are taking place, wherefrom the changes are coming, what the causes are, what the reasons are, what the ultimate goal of the individual soul is, and what the actual form of the individual soul is. One should also know the distinction between the individual living soul and the Supersoul, their different influences, their potentials, etc.”

There are several Upanishads which make it abundantly clear that the Manifest Self created the fourteen Devatas as rulers of the fourteen spheres. It is believed that these fourteen spheres exist inside us as well. Few other Upanishads give the entire role of the fourteen inside our body. It is said that the higher portions of the self are constituted by the power having direct link to the fourteen and through them, it is possible to attain union with the Manifest Self. This knowledge is extremely important and this is true knowledge, as per verse 2.

Commenting on this, NG says: “When speaking of the attributes of kshetra (the field) the term vikari (having modifications, transformations) is used, while the term prabhava (specialized becoming) is used in reference to the superior value connected with wisdom, which corresponds to the knower of the field. Pure knowledge or wisdom knows no transformations, transmutations, evolution or change, but the actual, represented here by the field, being opposed to wisdom, is subject to necessary change And therefore to various modifications or evolution. Vikari (modifications) further has a deprecatory sense suggesting change for the worse.”

[4]

Sung by rishis (seers) in many ways, severally and distinctly in (different) metres, and also in the aphoristic words of the Brahma-Sutras replete with critical reasonings and positively determined.

This verse confirms the Islamic view that there have been several Messengers from God who brought the teachings and Krishna was one of them. Since God’s creation were not only speaking Sanskrit or confined to the Indian Subcontinent, it cannot be expected that no Messengers were sent in the rest of the regions and in various other languages. The fact that similar pattern of growth of teachings is seen all across the world is a clear proof that the Messengers were working everywhere. Another proof is that all talked about one and only God. Islam maintains that 124,000 Messengers were sent all across the world, Adam being the first and Mohammad the last. Gita is referring to that. Unfortunately, those with narrow vision, say that this is reference to the rishis in a particular region. It is unfortunate that we call Krishna as the Avatar of God and then confine Him to a particular area and language.

We have a feeling here that Gita is again talking about something that Arjuna understood well but the commentators have not been able to understand it. The very fact that Brahmasutra is mentioned here, takes us to believe that he is referring to the manifest form of the God, as we know that the Devatas originated from the one light - Brahma. We also know from Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad that the Non-manifest form of God decided to create a Manifest form and hence the Noor or Light was created, which divided into several Noors or Divinities, from whom, owing to their devotion and worship to God, were created all the moving and non-moving (living and non-living objects) in this Universe (one united verse) of God. 

Through this, it is easy to understand that the soul of human beings is linked directly to the Divine Souls of those Beings and through them to the Absolute God. This means clearly that in this world, it must be the Devatas who will fit the description of tadvidah (those who know) as mentioned in verse I. Since Devatas were worshipped much more than present times during the period of Arjuna, and the sages of the period were aware of their mention in Vedas and other scriptures, and singing verses to eulogize them were common, Arjuna knows exactly what the talk is about, whereas we have problems in understanding the real nature of the conversation.

However, description given by commentators like NG itself indicates that they too have a feeling that there is some underlying meaning that continues in these verses, with the only difference being that what NG has seen to be hesitation, is actually a clear indication that the meaning was so clear to Arjuna that no need was felt to elaborate on it. NG writes: “Note here in the first place that while this verse refers to the field specifically, seemingly with a subtle purpose behind it, there is omission of any direct reference by name to the kshetraja (knower of the field). Even in verse I we noticed that there was already some hesitation in naming these two counterparts – the field and the knower of the field, - attributing their recognition vaguely or elusively to other sages or to sages generally. The same sages will be referred to in verse 4.” 

As we study the difference between the two counterparts as stated in the verses that follow, we notice also that there is no direct reference to kshetrajna (the knower of the field) in verse II, although it is meant to be implied by the author in the more comprehensive term jnana (wisdom) which is there contrasted with ignorance, thus by-passing the concept of kshetrajna (the knower of the field) altogether. Thus the connotation of the term kshetrajna (knower of the field) in verse 3 has already shifted its own centre with a slightly higher value than what it meant in the initial definition as directly referring to the body. We have already pointed out how, even there, it could not be a body in the sense of a carcass, but something that has a value in the context of contemplation, in however finite terms it might be thought of.

Here we find the field gains its status more by contrast with the ignorance mentioned in verse 11, than with anything fundamentally its own. When we find in verse 6 that the field and its transformations include such factors as intelligence and firmness, the theoretical status that the field gains becomes more accentuated.

We shall see, however, in verses 5 and 6, a very striking difference between the orthodox enumeration of tattvas (principles) as belonging to prakriti (nature) in the Samkhya (rationalist) philosophy, and even from the description of the lower nature of the Absolute as enumerated in VII, 4. We have to look out for a revalued position here wherein a greater unity is established between prakriti (nature) and purusha (spirit) or between kshetra (field) and kshetrajna (the knower of the field) than was understood hitherto, whether by the Samkhya or even in the earlier Chapters of the Gita itself.

The unitively superior status that the kshetrajna (knower of the field) is to gain in this Chapter becomes evident from verse 7 onwards. The enumeration of values there ranges from the simple personal value of humility to wisdom as the highest of absolutist values [these are the qualities that the knower of the field must possess]. The status of kshetra (the field) itself (and its modifications) is also seen slightly promoted in the enumeration of items referring to it in verses 5 and 6, beginning from the gross elements, here slightly glorified by the attribute “great” and ending in the personal quality dhritih (firmness), which quality is here intended to be superior to chetana (vital intelligence). [More qualities that the knower of the field ought to possess.]

When speaking of the attributes of kshetra (the field) the term vikari (having modifications, transformations) is used, while the term prabhava (specialized becoming) is used in reference to the superior value connected with wisdom, which corresponds to the knower of the field. Pure knowledge or wisdom knows no transformations, transmutations, evolution or change, but the actual, represented here by the field, being opposed to wisdom, is subject to necessary change and therefore to various modifications or evolution. Vikari (modifications) further has a deprecatory sense suggesting change for the worse.

Yatah (whence) refers to the field, but we find no direct answer is given, except the indirect suggestion in verse 11, that all that is other than wisdom belongs to ignorance. Hence the field results from ignorance, as Sankara ably argues in his long comment on verse 2. Further, Sankara points out that even avidya (ignorance) is an extraneous factor to the kshetrajna (knower of the field) who represents, in his words Ishwara (God) who in his terminology he interprets as being identical with wisdom or the Absolute. [That is why the Ahlulbayt were the most learned men not only of their own time, but several interesting comments of theirs that were authenticated centuries later due to later day advancement in science suggests that their knowledge far exceeded the knowledge of even the most advanced men of today.]

Ignorance, even as an upadhi (conditioning factor) in so far as it is capable of affecting the ordinary man’s notion of a pure unconditioned Absolute, must remain, on final analysis, as a limiting attribute to the Absolute. To lift the notion of the Absolute too far out of the human context would tend to make of it a mere abstraction which would be of no value. It would be a mere philosophical triviality prejudicial to the cause of wisdom. But if we recognize the Absolute, not abstractedly, but in the sense of a human value however ordinary, this particular form of intellectual difficulty which Sankara had to face could be easily avoided. [See how God had already removed that ‘intellectual difficulty’ as pointed out by Sankara and NG, through creation of its Manifest form, but it was our own fault that we corrupted the knowledge presented by God, so much so that our reason got confounded. Even solution to the ‘argument of the opponent’ that NG talks about in the next paragraph lies in accepting a manifest form of God governing our lives, with two opposing forces - forces of Noor (Light) and forces of Zulmat (Darkness) - continuously working on us.]

To the argument of the opponent that all shastras (revealed scientific texts) would become useless if the knower of the field was already beyond samsara (repeated cyclic existence), Sankara goes as far as to postulate the factor of ignorance as intervening in some sort of figurative or indirect way between the pure absolute God and the ordinary man to whom the shastras (revealed scientific texts) apply, as something intermediate which would make these texts necessary for him, almost as in the case of the dvaitins (dualistic philosophers) who tend to treat kshetrajna (the knower of the field) and kshetra (the field) more realistically. The introduction of such a third factor on the part of Sankara is rather artificial, and to some extent compromises his unitive stand on the primacy of the pure absolutist Ishwara (God).” 

Both Sankara and NG are confused, yet closer to truth. Accepting Devatas as originating from the manifest form of God and together comprising the forces of Noor, does not compromise with the unitive stand on the primacy of the pure absolutist Ishwara, as NG points out, and also removes “the factor of ignorance as intervening in some sort of figurative or indirect way between the pure Absolute God and the ordinary man” as Sankara points out.

[5-6]

The great elements, ego-sense, reason, and also the Unmanifest, the ten senses, and the one (mind) and the five conceptual aspects of the senses,

wish-dislike, pleasure-pain, the organic aggregation, vital intelligence, firmness: this in brief, is the field, with modifications named.

Factors such as buddhi (reason) and ahamkara (ego) are directly responsible for our ability or inability to understand the true nature of body (field) and the knower of the bodies (knower of fields). Both NG and ACBSP have given wrong explanation of these verses. We request you to read it, if possible, to verify that their explanations are not comprehensible easily, which is otherwise a marked feature of Gita. This can also be understood by NG’s reasoning that there is no strict agreement between the factors enumerated and it could be due to the requirements of prosody, which cannot be true, because if we believe Gita to be word of God, we will have to believe that not one of the word used is out of context. 

NG writes: “If we should try to relate these backwards to the Samkhya (rationalist) philosophy to which at first sight they reveal a general kinship, we find that there is no strict agreement between the factors enumerated. In the first place the order here has been mixed. Whether such a transposition is due to requirements of prosody merely is not quite clear. Moreover, under kshetra (the field) which may be said to correspond to the prakriti (nature) side of the Samkhya system, we have in verse 6 a new set of factors like chetana (vital intelligence) and it is not clear whether they belong to the orthodox Samkhya system or to the Yoga counterparts of the same dualistic school.”

Commentators’ inability to understand these verses lead us to conclude that very much like the previous verses, they have erred in understanding the real meaning of the verses here as well. Tadvidah (those who know) and paramam guhyam (supreme secret) and ‘the ignorance of the real truth about them’ that is being described here in detail, is one whose knowledge will lead us to the ananda (bliss). The same is being said more elaborately here. The same supreme secret has been unearthed by us in the BOOK. 

Before we proceed let’s see what Sarvasara-Upanishad has to say about Ananda (bliss). 

It is the seat of all sentient beings, like the ocean of the water, is eternal, pure, partless and non-dual, and is the sole essence of Chidananda (consciousness-bliss).

There are ten senses that a body comprises of, which get associated with the outside world. It is through these 10 senses that the material tendencies make their impact felt. Mind is another part of the body or field, which has a tendency to get swayed when faced with an onslaught of materialistic forces. In addition to this, there are usual natural tendencies like the wish-dislike, pleasure-pain, the organic aggregation, vital intelligence and firmness, all of which bring negative effect. The atma (soul), whose role is to show the right path to man, has to fight all these material forces and crush them on a repeated basis, throughout the life of that body. 

It is curious to note that the Unmanifest too has been mentioned along with these material forces. The reason is that it is extremely difficult for a man, surrounded as he is by all such material influences, to understand the Unmanifest nature of God. That is why, despite the fact that God sent innumerable Messengers and Prophets from time to time, man had the tendency to forget the teachings about the Unmanifest God. In order to satisfy his desire to have a material god, he created idols and started worshiping them and forgot all about the teachings given by the Prophets.

This is despite the fact that God Himself knew of the difficulties that man would face in believing and worshipping a God that does not confirm with his material likings. Knowing this, He Himself had created a Manifest form of His Personality, which created Brahma as the force of Light and got divided to give birth to the Devatas. This was perhaps done to satisfy the human urge to see material proofs. Vedas had introduced these Divine Personalities of the Devatas and we know from Upanishads that people waited for them and prayed for their early arrival. But when the wait grew long and the Devatas still did not appear, they again got astray, created idols of the illustrious from amongst their forefathers, of demons and even of those very Messengers like Krishna and Rama, who had come to teach them how to reach the Absolute God. This is extremely sorrowful that while Gita talks about no other worship but of the Absolute God, and tries in every possible manner to take us to the God, people worship idol of that very Krishna, with whom Gita is associated.

“The great elements”, we have seen in the BOOK, are none but the Devatas - the guardians of the 14 spheres – who have direct relationship with the higher self inside us. We have also shown that the 5 ‘great elements’ and the two else viz. ego and reason are actually reference to the 7 names of Devatas who are actually 14 in number. After these 7 names, the next word used is ‘Unmanifest’ and then ‘the ten senses’ and the rest of things are described. It is clear there are several things that people of the time weren’t aware of and still there are a lot many things that we are not aware of. 

[7]

Freedom from conventional pride, unpretentiousness, non-hurting, non-retaliating forbearance, straightforwardness, loyal support of the teacher (acharya), purity, steadfastness, and state of self-withdrawal;

It is clearly stated earlier in verse 2 of this Chapter that the God is the knower of the fields. From 5-6, it is evident that the God being talked about is the Manifest form and not the Non-manifest state of God, which has confounded an ordinary man’s reasoning ability to reach Him. Man too can become the ‘knower of the field’ by understanding the real relationship between field (body) and the knower of the fields (knower of the bodies). In case, man’s soul emerge victorious in the ongoing fight between the soul and the negative material forces talked about in verses 5-6, then he becomes the “knower of the field” and show the virtues that are being mentioned in verses 7 to 11. Devatas, we are sure, were knower of the fields, since all the animate and non-animate bodies were created from out of their Soul (Atma). That is why all these virtues perfectly fit their personality.

We have also reasoned in the previous verse that it is the various Divine Beings who were created out of the first Noor created by the Manifest Self of God, and it is they who form a link between the body (field) and the Absolute God. Virtues of those Divine Beings, when they will come to live on this earth, are being described here in this verse, so that we can identify them. Vedas had given the incidents of their lives so as to facilitate us in recognizing them, whereas Gita goes on to describe the virtues inherent in their character, which together form the essence of jnanam (wisdom), mentioned earlier.

NG also agrees that this description is that of the knower of the field and talks about their virtues in the following manner: “Verses 7 to 11 form a natural section. Items here range from such factors as lack of pride to that supreme value called wisdom.”

Devatas will be identified in this world from various virtues, the first of which is amanitvam (freedom from conventional pride). The second epithet, adambhitvam (unpretentiousness), implies the same principle of integrity or being true to oneself. As a corollary to the same self-sufficient attitude, they never want to interfere with the happiness of any being around him. A universal generosity here called ahimsa (non-hurting) is implied in this kind of self-sufficiency.

Kshanti (non-retaliating forbearance) is not a leave-me-alone attitude that ignores society, as described by NG, but forbearance while living as an active member of this society. Arjavam (straightforwardness) implies a certain frankness which speaks out without fear or favour, and which also shows independence from popular approbation. This can be clearly seen in the discourses of Ali mentioned in the book called Nahjul Balaghah or Husain’s own lectures, while face to face with the mighty army of Yazid. He is also an acharya (teacher) [remember Ali saying ‘ask whatever you wish to ask before I depart from amongst you’ and if people did not ask serious questions on a regular basis, it was due to their own ignorance. Moreover, written records of Ali saying that he can even teach how to light the houses from the waterfalls or Jafar al-Sadiq’s disciple (Jabir ibne Hayyan) being acknowledged by the world as ‘father of Chemistry’ are available.] Devatas, when they came to live on this earth, are known to have talked about the distance of the sun from the earth, about the distinguishing characteristics of animals that lay eggs and those who don’t and on various other subjects that were only found to be true when their views matched with the observations of latter day scientists, centuries later. Hindus who believe Siva or Rudra to be the ruler of the trilok (three worlds) and the progenitor of all mankind should know that the light or Noor of Siva descended in human body to be called Ali while the Devi was called Fatima. There was a time when there were great differences between the Hindus; some of them were Saivites who worshipped Siva while others were Vaishnavites, who worshipped Vishnu while few others worshipped the Devi. These differences were because of ignorance and their inability to know the true position of these divinities with God and between themselves. Even now Shivaratri is celebrated with great fervour whereas Vishnu, who is higher, is not remembered. Neither are oblations and worship reserved for the Absolute God.

In addition to this, their role in teaching the principles of Jurisprudence, and showing us the way to reach God, is most important as their role as teacher. If anybody understood the real science, i.e. the science of the Atma, they were the Devatas i.e. the Noor that descended in the bodies of Mohammad (Indra), Fatima (Saraswati) and the 12 Adityas. Let us try to understand this science only through them.

Other virtues described here include saucham (purity), which has been described by NG as referring ‘not only to freedom from actual dirt, but from anything tending to depress or tarnish the state of the spirit.’ It is worth remarking here that there is an explicit verse in Quran about the Prophet and his progeny which says that it is the wish of God that He keeps them free from any impurity. This verse has also been described in Hadees-e-Kisa, which clarifies that the Ahlulbayt (of God) and none else is meant by this verse.

Sthairyam (steadfastness or constancy) means he does not change his way of life in favour of values other than the contemplative. This is also clearly reflected in Husain’s stance in Karbala or even Prophet Mohammad saying to his uncle Abu Talib that even if they (the kafirs) were to keep the sun on his one hand and the moon on the other, he was not to distance himself from the true path. People of the time tried everything, including inducing offers of materialistic wealth to torturing or killing them, but never succeeded in their objective of deviating them from the path that they followed.

With steadfastness is mentioned atmavinigrahah (state of self-withdrawal). The fact that this virtue too was present to its extreme can also be noticed by studying their lives.

[8]

detachment in respect of sense-interests, absence of egoism, insight regarding the pain and evil of birth, death, old age, and disease:

This verse continues with describing the virtues of the knower of the fields. A detailed study of the lives of Devatas, when they came to live on this earth, will make it clear that all the seemingly contradictory virtues can be found in a person, without him having to resort to sanyasa (renunciation) from the world. Without reading more about these Devatas, commentators like NG will never understand how such seemingly diverse virtues can fit into one personality. 

They are detached from seeking the interests that the senses desire; they are far distant from egoism (ahamkara) and are never inflicted with the dukha (suffering) that comes out of birth, death, old age and disease.

But this does not mean that such characteristics cannot be acquired by us. It is within our capacity of each one of us to become Purushottama (Ashraful Makhlooqat) by acquiring the virtues described above. However, we should know that such characteristics cannot be acquired independently. They are in fact directly proportional to the purity of our atma (self) and the state of its proximity with the Manifest Self. 

[9]

without clinging to,  (and) without intensely-involved attachment to, (relations such as) sons, wives, (and property such as) houses, and having a constant neutral mental attitude in respect of desirable and undesirable happenings.

NG writes: “This verse reflects an attitude of general neutrality towards happenings as well as towards domestic or family relations, besides not being attracted by common interests such as wealth, etc. The attitude to wife and children referred here does not imply that he is purposely unjust to them or partial either. He takes an impersonal neutral attitude in the matter, balancing justly between the two opposing tendencies that might influence his judgement. He never errs on the side of partiality to his own blood-relations.”

[10]

devotion to Me to the exclusion of everything extraneous, and never straying from the (direct) path, preference to dwell in a place apart, distaste for crowded living;

Such a person is fully engrossed in devotion to the Paramatma, not for a moment gets involved in anything extraneous, and never strays from the direct path. The reference to straying from direct path was also mentioned by Prophet Mohammad, when he said closer to the time of his departure from this world: “I am leaving behind two valuable things – the Quran and the Ahlulbayt – if you remain associated with them, you will never stray from the right path.” The first chapter of the Quran, Surah Hamd, also prays to God to show the right path, the way of those who have been guided and not those who have fallen astray.

It must be noted that ‘preference to dwell in a place apart’ and ‘distaste for crowded living’ have been mentioned in the context of ‘devotion to Me (God) to the exclusion of everything extraneous’ and does not mean the popular concept of sanyasa (renunciation) as practiced by people today. It only reflects that devotion to God is beyond any other purpose of show or self-aggrandisement. Prophet Mohammad used to go to a cave in a mountain to meditate and worship, and then return to lead a normal life, where too God was never to be forgotten. When the Prophet had to migrate to Medina, a place where there was no cave in the vicinity, he found the seclusion of mosque at night for keeping aloft his prayers and worship of God. 

Not only this, as per Hadees-e-Qudsi, God says that He was a hidden treasure and when He wanted that the treasure be cognized, He created (the Noor of) Mohammad. This is reference to the Manifest Self of God but Islamic traditions do not give detailed descriptions of various stages, as given by the Vedas and Upanishads, which have named each stage separately. There is a separate name in the so-called Hindu scriptures to the Manifest Self, to the first Noor created by the Manifest Self, different names when this one Noor divided into two Noors and also different names when part of one of the Noors divided with the other half created by the division between the first Noor, and also different names when 7 Noors were created and still different names when 14 Noors were created and made guardians of the 14 spheres. It is this multiple nomenclature which has created confusion so much so that Hindus of today believe there are uncountable number of Devatas. 

The Manifest Self created more, so that greater number of creations are there to worship God. This is the reason why the Ahlulbayt spent their lives in showing us the best way to worship God in different situations. Why should it not be since this was the purpose of their creation! This statement amply justifies what has been said in Gita and the Vedas. God created the Manifest Self and Brahma (Mohammad) was created as first of the forces of Noor. But simultaneously, forces of darkness too were created, thus giving both options for created beings, so that they have the choice to opt for either for the two. Rewards and punishments too have been created as a consequence of this test, created as God’s Divine Will.

Mohammad’s Noor was created so that the hidden treasure - God - gets cognized. We should not have any doubts therefore if all the Divine Creations from Manifest Self onwards as well as Brahma, Devatas, Devi and Avatars like Krishna, Jesus, Buddha and Rama ceaselessly tried to lead us to the worship of God. During their life on earth, the Ahlulbayt, ceaselessly showed through example the zenith of supplication to Almighty God, even so underneath the blade of sword or during the process of severing of head from body by a blunt dagger. We must not doubt, therefore, if Krishna orders a fight-unto-death against those who associated others with God and Quran orders a similar fight against those who do so.

[11]

everlasting affiliation to the wisdom pertaining to  the Self (atma), insight into the content of philosophical wisdom – this is declared  to be wisdom; whatever is other than this is ignorance.

Writes NG: “The wisdom here refers to the Self (atma) as implied in the first epithet, and at the same time is conceived in positive or objective terms as implied in the second epithet. The jnanam (wisdom) referred to in the second line should be taken to be the true knowledge of verse 2 and as substituting the notion of kshetrajna (knower of the field) which has been conveniently forgotten, as we have pointed out.

This culminating wisdom is a unitive factor covering both the field and the knower of the field. It is as it were a central value which may even be said to be implicit in the word antaram (principle of difference, differential) in the last verse of this Chapter and which, as stated there, is to be discerned by the jnanachakshushah (eye of wisdom).

Under ajnana (ignorance), similarly, there is to be implied all those aspects of the field which lead the consciousness away from higher wisdom-values, including both those that tend to do so, and those falling outside the scope of contemplation altogether, such as the decaying aspects of a dead body, wherein no soul-happiness is any more to be enjoyed. 

In reviewing the section covered from verses 5 to 11 inclusive, in which both the idea of the field and the knower of the field were covered in a special and unitive way, which we have tried to explain, we find that beginning from the idea of a body which was only superior to a mere carcass by a margin of contemplative principle involved, we have touched in the knower of the field an all-comprehensive wisdom-value which is going to be expounded more finally in verse 12, by way of rounding up the section, as we shall see.”

[12]

I shall declare that which is to be known, which, being known, one gains immortality; the beginningless, having Me as its supreme culminating factor, the Absolute, which is said to be neither existence nor non-existence.

God has already talked of the relationship between man’s body and God by means of the intermediate Manifest Self of God and the Devatas. This is talked about as the Supreme Secret, and the lack of this knowledge has been termed as ignorance. 

The term used is Jnana, which has been described by Sarvasara Upanishad as the self-light. 

It is that which illuminates all. It is that Absolute Consciousness which is without any obscuration. It is that Consciousness which has no beginning or end, which is perpetual and which is the witness to all modifications and their opposites.

Interestingly, even Quran says that consciousness is courtesy Allah. 

The fact that commentators like NG are confounded by the description till this stage is also present in his words, when he says: “From this verse onwards we have a complete picture of the unitive Self or the eternal Absolute or whatever may be designated by tat (That). It is unmistakable from the description that it is not an entity which could be definitely called either matter or spirit. As stated in verse 19, both matter and spirit have to be given an equal status as values and considered as eternal or beginningless. [That clearly means that the spirit of the Devatas or the matter of their bodies when devas came to live in this world – both should be given an equal status as values and considered as eternal or beginningless.] The Absolute implied here in verse 12 is neither sat (existence) nor asat (non-existence), and is of the nature of a paradox, in the same way as in the Eleatic philosophers, Parmenides and Zeno. The one and the many adhere together in this notion of the Absolute, as stated in verse 30.

When it is said that the Absolute participates in both existence and non-existence, and the one and the many, it should not be thought however, that it combines contradictions, reducing the notion to a mere absurdity. It should be conceived rather as valid as a datum of reasoning, or better still as an authentic human value to be intuitively understood, and not as a mere contradiction in terms of bhedabheda vadins (difference-non-difference thinkers) would tend to look upon it.”

Ultimately the worship has to be of the Absolute. Inability to understand how we are related to the Absolute through Devatas and the Manifest Self, some people see contradictions in the description of Gita. The words like anadimatparam (beginningless) and having Me (Manifest Self) as its supreme culminating factor) indicate that atma has to be united with the Paramatma but it is the Absolute which is both sat (existence) asat (non-existence), who is to be known. 

This is the secret that is jneyam (what is to be known).

[13]

With hands and feet everywhere, with eyes and hands, and mouths, with hearing everywhere, in the world, That remains, enveloping all.

This refers to the Absolute, whose power is beyond comprehension. We have repeatedly said that the Manifest Self of God is doing the talking here and it is referring to the Absolute as ‘That’.

 [14]

Shining by the specific characters of the senses, devoid of all sense (attributes); unattached, supporting all; without qualities, and perceiving qualities.

Again, NG talks of the paradoxical statements in Gita, due to his inability to understand the meaning as meant by God. He says: “This verse contains three paradoxical statements. The first is quite within the range of our own experience, when we think of dreaming, where things are seen without the help of eyes, etc. The second paradox is easily understood if we think of space supporting form. Regarding the third paradox, we know that the pure Absolute is not subject to the modalities of the three degrees of specialization in nature called the gunas (qualities). They act only as conditioning factors, like Shelley’s “dome of many-coloured glass”.”

All these paradoxes will remain no more if we retranslate Gita in the light of relationship told by us. 

 [15]

Without and within beings; immobile and mobile too; because subtle That is unknowable; That stands far and near also.

Again the word ‘tat’ is used meaning ‘that’. Absolute God is being described in these verses who is the support of all the powers, has hands and feet everywhere and envelopes all. But since people of the period gave greater importance to Devatas, again a relationship of the divine beings is described vis-a-vis the Absolute. The Absolute is without and also within the beings. That is immobile and mobile too; far and also near to us and in subtle state He is unknowable. 

[16]

And undivided, yet remaining divided as it were in beings; supporter of existence and That which is to be known; holding back and releasing for expansive becoming.

ACBSP has translated this verse as follows: 

Although the Supersoul appears to be divided among all beings, He is never divided. He is situated as one. Although He is the maintainer of every living entity, it is to be understood that He devours and develops all.

This verse again justifies our arguments. In fact, unless you take our argument as true, it is not possible to describe ‘undivided, yet remaining divided’. The Divine Souls are undivided and are actually One Noor created by the Supreme Atma, which Itself was created by God as His Manifest form. This is despite the fact that from that One Supreme Atma were created Indra, Vayu, Saraswati, Agni and the rest, who were born on this earth as Mohammad, Ali, Fatima, Husain and the rest of Mohammad’s progeny. It was perhaps this reason that Mohammad said that despite they being different personalities, they were all Mohammad. 

First is Mohammad, middle is Mohammad, last is Mohammad, all are Mohammad.

Moreover, certain Upanishads describe clearly that the Manifest Self became two, which were identical to the original one, these became five and the five became fourteen. All fourteen were identical to each other and also identical to the Noor of Brahma created by the Manifest Self, from where this division started. These divinities have a direct relation with the atma in our bodies.

The ‘undivided, yet remaining divided’ has been taken to mean Supersoul’s presence in all beings by ACBSP. Similarly, Absolute too is the supporter of all existence through it being the creator of the Manifest Self itself and it is ‘That’ – the Absolute God – that is to be known. 

The fact that they are beginningless as described in verse 12 in this Chapter can be understood from the fact that they actually owe their origin due to desire of the Unmanifest to have a Manifest form and have been there even prior to the time of Man’s origin. That is why Mohammad said at a juncture, “I was even a Prophet when Adam was being water and sand.” And Husain said that the sun, the moon, the earth, the entire cosmos – owe their origin to them (Prophet and his progeny).

These verses also explain why the God will call for convulsion of the entire universe when the last of the Devatas will be killed, that is why ‘supporter of existence’ is used as description of their virtues. Vishnu Purana explicitly talks about this process of convulsion, after the last of the Avatars will depart. That is why it is said here that all the creation owes its origin from them (Devatas or Ahlulbayt) and it is they because of whom destruction of the world will occur.

Without knowing our argument, NG sees paradoxes in this verse as well which, we are sure, will get removed once the real meaning of these verses become clear to him and others. 

NG writes: “Again three paradoxes are implied, two explicit and one hidden. In the first explicit one, the word iva (as it were) is meant to relieve the contrast somewhat. The paradox of the one and the many is meant, although it is expressed in terms of outward appearances.

The second paradox here has the implied opposition between the counterparts bhutabhartri (supporter of existence) and jneyam (what is to be known) which in this Chapter should be understood as an objective philosophical entity to be clearly placed in a circle part, as it were, from jnanam (wisdom), subjectively considered. The opposition between the two counterparts is the same as that between existence and subsistence.

The third pair of paradoxical counterparts is based on the notion that there is a centrifugal and a centripetal principle involved in reality, whether cosmic or psychic. Grasishnu (grasping) refers to the centripetal tendency to hold inwards, and prabhavishnu (releasing expansive becoming) is the centrifugal tendency.”

[17]

The Light even of lights, That is said to be beyond darkness; knowledge, the knowable and what is to be reached through knowledge; particularly located in the hearts of everyone.

The Devatas were created from Light or Noor and hence they are called Devatas. People of the period worshipped these Devatas and were unaware of any higher power. The higher power – the Absolute – is once again being referred to as the Light even of lights (jyotisham api taj jyotis). We have seen that Muslim scriptures too refer to God as Noor al-Noor (Light of Lights). 

We know now that Zulmat (Force of Darkness) was created at the same time when the Noor was created. Quran explicitly says God is the creator of Noor and Zulmat. The Absolute was there even when Zulmat had not been created; henceforth it is referred to as ‘beyond darkness’.

Once we are able to subdue the Zulmat within us, cut all connections with it, and align ourselves on the path of ascent towards Noor, we realize that knowledge of the Absolute alone is desired, He alone is ‘the knowable’ and He alone ‘is to be reached through knowledge’.

[18]

Thus the field, and wisdom, and what has to be known, have been briefly told; My devotee, having known this, attains to My state of being.

How the body (field) is related to the Absolute through the media of the Manifest nature of God in the form of Divine Lights (Divine Atmas) and their virtues are what is to be known, whereas these Divine Lights (Divine Atmas), their presence in spiritual and material form, and their relationship with God can only be understood through wisdom as talked about in verse 11. Any devotee of God, as per Gita, who knows this divine secret, becomes one with the Manifest Self.

ACBSP has called this Divine Atma as the Supersoul, which is a manifestation of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Beyond this, we do not agree to most of what that is said.

Rama too, like Krishna, was an Avatar of the Manifest Self or Vishnu. He says in Muktikopanishad to Hanuman: 

O son of Vayu! Always worship My Reality that is destructive of pains, without sound, touch, form, decay, taste, destruction or smell, and without name and Gotra (clan). I am that non-dual One (Brahman) that is of the nature of the visible (Jnana), like unto the Akas, supreme, always shining, without birth, non-dual, without destruction, without attachment and pervading all. I am the All, and of the nature of salvation. One should ever meditate upon Me thus: ‘I am of the form of the visible (Jnana), the pure, of changeless nature and have really no objects in Me. I am the ever-full Brahman, traverse and across, up and down.’ Also meditate upon Me thus: ‘I am birthless, deathless, ageless, immortal, self-shining, all-pervading, destructionless, causeless, pure beyond the effect (of the universe) and ever content. When one’s body becomes a prey to time, he gives up the state of Jivanmukti, as the wind attains the motionless state.’

It is clear from this aforementioned description that Paramatma spoke even from the body of Rama, just as he is speaking from the body of Krishna here. This confirms that both Rama and Krishna were Avatars. Rama too is talking of need to worship the Absolute God. It is unfortunate that we started worshipping idols of physical bodies of Rama and Krishna whereas the Paramatma speaking through their bodies is talking of need to worship the Absolute God. 

The same relationship is described in the Rig Veda also which confirms that Gita and Vedas are not talking about diverse topics but it is we who understood them differently: 

Like the eye which is spread in the Akas (seeking all things without any obstacle), so the wise ever see the Supreme Seat of Vishnu [the Manifest Self]. The Brahmanas that have ever the Divine vision praise in diverse ways and illumine the Supreme Seat of Vishnu. 

[19]

Know you that nature and spirit are both beginningless; and know you also that modifications and their intrinsic modalities are born of nature.

After seemingly closing a section with verse 18 in which the answers to the three sets of questions of Arjuna were expressly concluded, we have here another extra section covering verses 19 to 22 inclusive in which, considering the importance that the subject deserves, the Lord again begins to talk about the relationship between the human body, the divine spirit, nature and the Absolute, so as to clear any doubts that may have still remained. 

The Absolute created a spirit as His Manifest form. The spirit, as it owed its origin to the Absolute, also had the virtues of the Absolute. Therefore, all the virtues that the Absolute is said to possess also became the virtues of this spirit. The Devatas were subsequently created. They too enjoyed the same virtues. Yet, these virtues were not their own, but owed their origin to the Absolute, just as the Lights (Noor) of the Devatas owed their power to God. That is why God has been referred to as Noor-al-Noor (Light of the Lights).

From this spirit, nature evolved and led to the creation of the entire world, including the living beings and therefore the virtues of the spirit became the virtues of all of these in their uncorrupted form. For instance, a child is born with his spirit being part of the pure Divine spirit. Therefore, certain virtues like truthfulness are part of his spirit, until they are corrupted by external influences of nature. Devatas described as ‘perfectly pure’ possess the virtues in their uncorrupted form. 

However, Gita also states materialistic tendencies are due to the natural forces influencing a person. For instance, the need for God to create a Manifest form of Himself was because of the tendencies of man’s materialistic nature. This negative trait is because of the material nature as per which man wishes to see everything in material form, without which it is difficult for him to understand the real truth. 

In fact, purusha (spirit) in pure form is fixed and has certain inherent virtues. But modifications and modalities are part of prakriti (nature). Human beings, trees, animals and every living creature passes through the same laws of nature, i.e. they are born weak and susceptible to outside influences, grow into strong and sturdy being and then pass through old age and the consequent death. The world too, we know through Vishnu Purana, is to pass through these stages, and we are presently passing a phase of Kaliyuga, when it is nearing its death. 99.4 per cent of this Divine Day of God (one Divine Day is equal to 1000 creations) is nearly over. Divine Night, equal to the period of the Divine Day, will commence thereafter.

When the Divine Souls came down to live in this world, their body too was susceptible to changes as per prakriti, which is a continuous non-ending process. It is this inter-relationship that is further described in succeeding verse.

[20]

In what concerns agency for cause and effect the motivating factor is said to be nature; in the matter of the experiencer of pleasure and pain, the motivating factor is spirit.

ACBSP has translated this in these words: 

Nature is said to be the cause of all material causes and effects, whereas the living entity is the cause of the various sufferings and enjoyments in this world.

The previous verse had said that the prakriti (nature) and the spirit were actually beginningless. The prakriti (nature) and the purusha (spirit) are again referred to here as dual aspects of reality, they both being inter-related and inter-opposing tendencies or forces. 

Since the cosmos has been created out of this Divine Spirit, it can be said that the nature that we see present in the cosmos also owes its origin to that Divine Spirit. It is prakriti (nature) that is responsible for all causes and their subsequent effects that we see happening in this world. So much so that howsoever a man dies, whether he dies of cancer, or heart failure, or a particular disease or falling from a height, a cause is there that interfered with nature. Even if his body is pierced with a sword or a knife, there is a certain natural process of cause and effect that can be witnessed. 

We have seen that the motivating factor of nature is behind all causes and effects that we see in this mechanistic world. Similarly, in what we know in the everyday world as pleasure and pain, the motivating factor belongs to one who can feel such pleasure and pain, here named purusha (spirit). Thus the thin dividing line that is sought to be explicitly defined by this verse lies between the conscious spirit which is capable of feeling, and the inert matter which is within the domain of causality, and which does not necessarily imply a selective or aesthetic consciousness, yet which continuously interact with the body through its various senses described in verses 5-6, and can even have an overpowering effect on the body as against the spirit pulling towards virtues and righteous deeds. 

[21]

The spirit, seated in nature, appreciates the modalities born of nature; association with the modalities is the cause of births in good or evil wombs.

We have said in previous verse that both prakriti (nature) and purusha (spirit) are inter-related and inter-opposing. In the explanation of this verse, NG writes: “This verse is an attempted explanation of the process involved in reincarnation, contributing to the inequality of status between types of men. The subject is not one that directly concerns spirituality in the best sense of the word. But inequality in this world as an expression of injustice touches on sociology and ethics, and can drastically influence politics, as it has done in India in the name of caste, which is a major problem that can hardly be by-passed by an author such as Vyasa, whose figure may said to stand at the very core of Indian spirituality, representing the supreme role of dialectical revaluation, of a superior way of life, individual or collective. 

In the theorization implied here, Vyasa is not unlike Plotinus in his graphic description of how the soul enters matter. Bergson’s theories of matter and spirit follow the same lines. Even in the Gita the allusion to birth in good or evil wombs has to be read side by side with xv, 8 and xvi, 19. There is a slight contradiction to be observed when the implication of this verse is read with the implication of verse 31 of this Chapter, where it is said that the Self is not affected though seated in the body, and though touching the body it is not tainted by the body.”

Fact is that there is no contradiction as pointed out by NG. Spirit and matter are different. The spirit in the body does not get corrupted when touched by the material body. If that would have been so, man would have refrained from helping a diseased person, picking up a child fallen in filth or even touching a dead body. Or for that matter, even washing the excretions that come out from his body itself. 

Spirit is seated in nature and has the power to appreciate the modalities of nature. If the modalities are negative in nature, they corrupt the purity of the spirit. Whether the spirit takes birth in good or bad wombs depend on the effect on it due to modalities of nature that it had to experience. 

Sankara has even suggested “that good wombs are those of Devas (divinities) and bad wombs those of lower animals, which would imply a still wider range which a choice possible outside the human context altogether,” says NG. This too confirms our view to the full!

The fight between spirit leading a man to virtues and auspiciousness and the material nature affecting the purity of the spirit is an ongoing process. Those who allow material nature to govern them are losers and those whose spirit comes out victorious are the gainers. This is the message of Gita.

[22]

Supervisor, and Permitter, Supporter, Experiencer, the Great lord, and also called the supreme Self (is) the supreme Spirit in the body.

NG comments on this in the following words: “The mystery implied in the mode of contact between nature and spirit which was left vague in the previous verse is sought to be further clarified here. Within the limits of the body, the Absolute in its purest implications, suffers from certain conditionings and limitations. The favourite example in Indian philosophy of a colourless, transparent crystal placed on red silk, the latter technically named upadhi (the conditioning factor) explains the contact to some extent. In chemistry we have the example of catalytic agents which themselves suffer no change while being necessary for effecting changes in other chemicals with which they are in contact. If these two examples still do not explain the mystery sufficiently, especially in a contemplative context, we find mentioned here some other functions or qualities of the supreme Self within the body limits, as its modified patterns of behaviour or types of personality.”

God has left the man to act upon his will. He has created the Divine spirit, which acts as a supervisor, permitter, supporter and experiencer. This is talked about as antaratma (the inner atma that shows the way) by people in India! On the other hand, man’s mind is free to respond to the onslaught of material forces in the manner he chooses. If the atma wins this battle, it gets free from the cycle of rebirth and if the mind succumbs to the negative forces, the atma gets corrupted.

The word upadrashta (supervisor) suggests the role of an overseer of works. The Absolute is the supervisor who sees the Devatas leading towards the path of guidance whereas the modalities of nature works on a man. This He does by giving the role of supervisors to the Devatas. That is why He has been referred to in Quran as ‘the judge of the judges.’ An Upanishad even describes the Devatas as the guardians of our organs of senses and action and He is the guardian of the actions of the Devatas (Ahlulbayt), difference being that while we can astray, the Devatas (Ahlulbayt) represent the forces of Light and have been created as pure. They, not even minutely, can digress from the true path. In fact, the path that they showed and lived is the true path indeed.

Likewise anumanta (permitter) can be thought of as a selective and eliminative principle. Certain acts are approved and certain others disapproved depending upon an innate principle derived from the Absolute.

“The word bharta (supporter, one who bears the weight) can in the first place be thought of, not necessarily as supporting from below, but from above as from a hanging lamp. The gross and active aspects of the senses, mind, etc., which form an aggregate in themselves, depend for their intelligent conscious function, on the spirit which is in contact with them, though indirectly. They are like the reflection of a flame on a mirror below, which reflection looks as though the flame were burning downwards, while in reality it is burning upwards. The reflection depends upon and may be said to be supported by the actual flame which represents pure wisdom, although within the limits of the body there is no harm in calling the same wisdom the supporter.

The term bhokta (experiencer) is similarly justified, although in a strict sense absolute wisdom cannot be called an enjoyer. Within the limits of the body it is permissible to refer to the spirit as enjoyer inasmuch as a dead body cannot enjoy anything at all, and whatever enjoyment or experiencing there is on the perceptual side, must belong in principle at least, to the Absolute.”

The expression mahesvarah (great lord) is used for the Manifest yet undivided form of the Absolute God, who is also the Supreme Self (Atma), a part of which is present as the atma (spirit) in each living body. This Supreme spirit has a corrective role to play in a human body, which gets weakened if the person enables materialistic desires to overpower the corrective tendencies.

[23]

He who thus knows spirit and nature, together with the intrinsic modalities, though he may happen to be leading every kind of life, is not born again.

He who knows the role of Divine Spirit and Nature, together with the intrinsic modalities, does not allow material tendencies to overpower his senses. As a consequence the spirit remains pure all through the life. When such a person’s body dies, the spirit gets united with spirit of the Supreme Soul and hence gets free from the cycle of rebirth.

[24]

By meditation some behold the Self (atma) in the Self (atma) by the Self (atma); others by Samkhya-Yoga (unitive reasoning) and others by karma-yoga (action unitively understood).

ACBSP’s translation: 

Some perceive the Supersoul within themselves through meditation, others through the cultivation of knowledge, and still others through working without fruitive desires.

As we have repeatedly said, the purpose of the Gita is to take us all to the worship of the Absolute God, who created the Supreme Atma or Paramatma or the Manifest Self. Three modes of reaching the Supreme Self are mentioned here. The first is through recognizing the Supreme Self (Paramatma) in one’s own self (atma) and using the corrective tendencies of the Divine Self inside us, which is the supervisor, permitter, supporter, experiencer and the Great Lord. 

Second way to realize the Absolute God is by Samkhya-Yoga or unitive reasoning that is talked about in detail elsewhere in Gita. The third course, Karma-yoga (action without fruitive desires) too has been talked about elaborately elsewhere and there is no need to explain it at the present moment. 

It is possible to reach the Absolute God through all these manners.

[25]

But others, not knowing as stated (above) worship, having heard from others; they also cross beyond death, depending on hearsay.

There are still others who have not understood any of the manners to reach the Absolute God. Way is not clear to them but they still wish, with sincerity, to reach God. They might have heard about various ways to reach the Absolute and sincerity endeavour to tread that path. Since God is compassionate and kind to His subjects, he grants salvation to even those who made a sincere attempt based on hearsay, i.e. without being aware of the various paths to reach Him. 

[26]

Whatever is produced, the unmoving or the moving, know you, O Best of the Bharatas (Arjuna), that to be from the union of the field and the knower of the field.

ACBSP says: 

O chief of the Bharatas, know that whatever you see in existence, both the moving and the non-moving, is only a combination of the field of activities and the knower of the field.

We find here a return to the terms field and the knower of the field, with which this Chapter started. In the course, both these were elaborated upon. Whereas field is the body comprised of material nature and includes the modalities of nature as well, the knower of the field has been described as the spirit in the body that is in alignment with the Supreme Soul of the Manifest form of the God and has certain virtues as inherent characteristics, which acts as supervisor, permitter, supporter and experiencer and prevents the man’s spirit from getting swayed by negative forces. We will know from the next chapter that even field or nature has modalities which could be sattvik, rajasik or tamasik, which determine what kind of material onslaught the spirit will have to face. Those in sattvik or pure mode will remain pure throughout whereas those in tamasik mode will not listen to the supervisory, permitting, supporting and experiencing nature of the Supreme Spirit working inside them and will actually make their own spirit corrupt.

A very interesting comment is given here in Gita, which says that not only the moving but even the non-moving objects are faced with these two opposing tendencies. Therefore, even moon as an object or stone are produced from the union of the field and the knower of the field. Since we have proved that the knower of the field is the spirit or the fourteen Devatas who comprise the Divine Spirit, it amounts to saying that every moving and non-moving object is created through the union of Divine Nature and Divine Spirit, comprising of the fourteen Devatas. Therefore, if Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad states that the moon, the sun and the stars, including the earth and the entire life on it, were created out of the Soul of the Brahma, we should not have any doubts in understanding this statement. Also, we should not doubt when the sun returns for the Ahlulbayt, when the Moon was split into two or when pebbles praised Allah (God) when they came in the hands of Mohammad. Not just the Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad, even Hadees-e-Kisa tells that the sun, the moon, the stars and everything has been created in love of the Ahlulbayt.

[27]

He who sees the supreme Lord abiding (in a state of) equality in all beings, within the perishing as the non-perishing, he sees.

The word samam (equal), as used here, implies the high principle of seeing the Supreme in all entities, which includes animate and inanimate objects according to the previous verse. This is different from the previous verses where the atma was described as the extension of the Manifest form of God, which was created by the Absolute God. But if man starts seeing the Absolute God Himself in all beings, moving or non-moving, he needs no intermediary, as the final goal is to reach the Absolute God himself. 

If a person starts seeing God in all moving and non-moving objects, there is bound to be peace on earth, as no man will be innocently killed or harassed, no animal and not even a tree leaf will be plucked unnecessarily. 

Also, no distinction will ever be made on the basis of caste, creed or religion. The entities here have the same status as values, each within its own category. As the non-perishing in the perishing, it is the Absolute God Himself that gives a final and equal status to all entities. Inequality of status in value is not conceivable when the value implied in all entities is understood to be that of the Absolute. 

[28]

For he who sees the Lord seated equally everywhere, destroys not the Self (Atma) by the Self (Atma); and then he attains the supreme goal.

ACBSP says: 

One who sees the Supersoul equally present everywhere, in every living being, does not degrade himself by his mind. Thus he approaches the transcendental destination. 

This is an elaboration of the thought mentioned in verse 27. The living entity, by accepting his material existence, has become situated differently than in his spiritual existence. But if one understands that the Supreme is situated in His Paramatma manifestation everywhere, he does not degrade himself by a destructive mentality, and his atma remains pure as ever. The mind is generally addicted to sense-gratifying processes; but when the mind turns to the Absolute God, one does not need to understand the relationship between the body and the knower of the body, etc. and becomes advanced in spiritual understanding.

Says NG: “When the Lord thus understood is equated with the Self, there is no longer any opposition. This principle by which the Self as the Lord can unitively merge in the notion of the Self as the soul or inner spirit, without any implied conflict between them, is explained in VI.6.

The expression hinasti (destroys) refers to the alternative contingency also mentioned in VI.6, which happens when the two Selfs here implicitly referred to for purposes of discussion, are non-unitively or non-contemplatively treated, contrary to the requirements of a yogic way of life. One who can treat them unitively easily reaches the highest goal.”

Is it not clear that NG is confused over the use of self twice? One self is our own self and the other Self is the Manifest Self (Paramatma) working inside us. Our own self gets destroyed when it attains unity the Manifest Self. This is the state of salvation. Manifest Self starts working within our body. Our body starts acting as the office of the Manifest Self. When the body speaks, one hears the Manifest Self speaking from the body.

[29]

He who sees that all actions are done by nature alone, and likewise that the Self is actionless, he (truly) sees.

ACBSP translates: 

One who can see that all activities are performed by the body, which is created of material nature, and sees that the self does nothing, actually sees. 

This thinking is also talked about in Gita on various occasions. A person who sees that all actions are done by nature alone, surely will not do actions for worldly benefits. He won’t pursue the materialistic benefits from actions and, therefore, will never seek the fruits of actions, when he will commit them. Likewise, he will only perform those actions that are necessary and refrain from performing any action other than these. This is so because in spite of the fact that the Manifest Self is responsible for all actions, all births and deaths, he knows that the Manifest Self does so only because it has been created by the Absolute God to do so. 

[30]

When he perceives the disjunct existence of beings established in the one, and from whence also their expansion, then he becomes the Absolute.

The principle of one and the many has been talked about before in this Chapter. This is not the discussion of creation of such a multitude of humanity from one - Adam. In fact, this speaks of the One Manifest Self getting divided and leading to the creation of the fourteen Devatas, identical to each other and also identical to the one Noor created by the Manifest Self. One must understand that all these divinities have source in One Absolute God alone. 

If you have agreed to our interpretation of the cause of war of Mahabharata, you will also agree that all this is to clarify doubts as regards to the true identity of the Devatas, in relation to the Absolute. One who understands the true relationship attains union with the Absolute. People who didn’t understand this relationship came to war against Krishna.

[31]

Having no beginning, having no attributes (gunas), this supreme Self, suffers no decrease though dwelling in the body, O Son of Kunti (Arjuna), it neither acts nor is it tainted.

ACBSP translates as follows: 

Those with the vision of eternity can see that the imperishable soul is transcendental, eternal, and beyond the modes of nature. Despite contact with the material body, O Arjuna, the soul neither does anything nor is entangled.

This begins the series of four verses in which the status of the One Manifest Self is restored to its full, untainted purity and glory. The word anadvitvam (beginninglessness) refers to the nature-aspect of the Absolute in his non-manifest state and nirgunatvam (attributelessness), further gives evidence to it. This is the same as sat and asat discussed by us before. Both put together and understood unitively gives us the neutral value, which is actionless though seated within the living body.

[32]

As the all-pervading subtle space-principle (akasa) is untarnished by reason of its subtlety, so the Self, seated everywhere in the body, is untarnished.

ACBSP writes: 

The sky, due to its subtle nature, does not mix with anything, although it is all-pervading. Similarly, the soul situated in Brahman vision does not mix with the body, though situated in that body.

The point mooted in the previous verse is further elaborated in this verse. Having no beginning, having no attributes, the Supreme Self suffers no decrease and is uniformly distributed in the body. Since the person described here believes it is that Supreme Self that is present in his entire body, he does nothing that would tarnish the self inside him.

ACBSP describes this verse by saying just as sky does not mix with other objects like light or space that are present near it, similarly the atma of a person who believes that it is the Non-manifest God that dwells in the body, remains aloof and unaffected from the material tendencies of the body.

[33]

As the one sun illuminates this whole world, so does the Lord of the field, O Bharata (Arjuna) illumine all the field.

Writes ACBSP: 

O son of Bharata, as the sun alone illuminates all this universe, so does the living entity, one within the body, illuminate the entire body by consciousness.

Such a person believes that there is One Absolute God alone who is all-powerful, all-pervading and omnipresent. This One God, even though He is without attributes (gunas), yet He is extremely powerful and illuminates the whole world. Moreover, He illuminates the insides of the body by being present there, irrespective of whether it is the body of a good or a bad person. This is similar to the sun which illuminates good and bad places indifferently, just revealing its aloofness and supremacy as a glorious value. By shining on the field it can even be supposed that the field itself and its visible existence depends on the unitive sun, which would thus include without difference the kshetra (field) and the kshetrajna (knower of the field), fused into one supreme value.

The individual divine entities or the Devatas that might constitute the field, as in verse 3, are overlooked here because “the many is treated as the dialectical counterpart of the one”, and taken collectively to be absorbed unitively in the value that the knower of the field represents analogously to the sun. 

[34]

Those who by the eye of wisdom perceive the difference between the field and the knower of the field (its bearing on) elements-nature-emancipation – they go to the Supreme.

Writes ACBSP: 

Those who see with eyes of knowledge the difference between the body and the knower of the body, and can also understand the process of liberation from bondage in material nature, attain to the supreme goal.

In this Chapter the most important subject to which the author wanted our attention to be directed was the distinction between the kshetra (the field) and the kshetrajna (the knower of the field). Summing up the discussion, the author says those who see with wisdom (wisdom is described in detail in verse 11) are able to find the link between field and the knower of the field, otherwise a great mystery. Such a person achieves emancipation and becomes one with the Supreme Himself and gets removed from the cycle of rebirth.

Writes NG: “The compound word bhuta-prakriti-moksha (elements-nature-emancipation) gives equal importance to the three sections, while referring to them summarily here. Some translators treat the compound word not as samahara-dvandva (collective-dual compound) but as panchami-tat-purusha (compound in which the members do not lose their independence) by which the word gains the meaning of “liberation of beings from nature”. The object of this concluding verse being one of the reviewing by way of a final resume of the subjects covered in this Chapter, we prefer to treat the compound as a form of samahara-dvandva.”[Note reference to ‘panchami’ meaning the five members.]

Whatever NG says and writes, you know now that the entire description in Gita (and also in the Vedas) is now getting clear if you understand the true personality of Devatas and know the cause of the war that Krishna fought and won. Those who know this relationship between the Devatas (who later took birth as Mohammad, Ali and Fatima and their progeny) with the Manifest Self and the relationship between the Manifest Self with the Absolute God attain union with the Absolute God.


Thus ends in the Upanishads of the Songs of God, in the Science of the Wisdom of the Absolute, in the Dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna, the Thirteenth Chapter entitled Unitive Understanding of the Distinction between the Actual and the Perceptual.